OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
92459700 over 5 years ago

Hi Chris, Much appreciate you taking the comment in such a friendly way, some folk get a bit upset no matter how polite you try to be.

All looks good now, Regards Bernard.

92459700 over 5 years ago

Hi, You've somehow dragged the two grass areas and churchyard out of alignment. I didn't fix it so you could see what's happened. Could you look to correct it please? Any problem let me know on the comments here and I'll fix it.

Regards Bernard.

92376276 over 5 years ago

Hi, some of your wood areas are mapped around shadows and the large tree crowns.
Regards Bernard.

92372683 over 5 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the name and landuse tags to proposed:? As the feature is in the proposed stage and thus not verifiable, (other OSM contributors might consider even this as not to OSM practice). Your tags stated the area was in commercial use and had a formal name. When/if the proposal work is started the area can be tagged as construction which is verifiable.

Regards Bernard.

92310562 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've unjoined the path from the private road at north and south. Then joined footpath 10 where it crosses the private road.

Regards Bernard.

92306434 over 5 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Is this a second set of toilets? The reason I ask is that Hurley Lock Toilet and Waste Disposal is mapped just fifty feet away.

Regards Bernard.

92302297 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A name only is not enough data for OSM to properly utilise and to have render on a map. Your web link was only to an image not a website, a description is not rendered on a map. Lastly the POI was joined to the highway center line, all-right for a street party but baking cakes?

I found your company details and have amended the POI data to that needed in OSM. I unjoined the POI from the highway. I don't know what house is number 5 so I've drawn the houses each side of the street near the POI position. Perhaps you could place the POI correctly over your building or put the tags on the building outline. If you need any help please just ask in the comment section here.

Regards Bernard.

92250030 over 5 years ago

Hi, Thanks for adding the Stagsike Trail to OSM.
However being relatively new to OSM you've made inadvertent mistakes. The new paths being drawn atop of existing highways duplication of the highway. You hadn't joined up the new ways properly anyway, (leaving gaps and overlaps). I've redrawn the trail by sectioning up the existing highways which make up the trail. Tagging them with the trail name and where appropriate adding foot=yes. Then I've removed all the duplications.

If the Stagsike Trail is a recognised signed trail you might want to consider adding a route relation to OSM. This would tie all the different parts of the trail together. I don't think adding relations is easy, if at all possible with GoMap. Is it a recognised trail, signed, is there a website, any trail information? If so I could add the route relation.

Regards Bernard.

91564546 over 5 years ago

Hello Darren, I found the website with the floors of the building. One way to map this would be to draw the whole Quadrangle as the main building, tag such. Draw the four buildings as building:part=apartments, name=?, levels=?, please see:-building:part=*. Also if possible map the entrances to each building part.

Each building part can have the individual address tags, with numbers of the apartments if possible. Alternatively a method sometimes used is to map the entrances and place the address tags on the entrance node.

I don't know how easy this all is with the iD editor but it's fairly easy with the JOSM editor. If you need any help please just ask? I may have a go at it later on if you don't want to.

Regards Bernard

91949703 over 5 years ago

Hi Andrew, Glad to assist, if you need help please just ask. There are several forums for mappers, you can message another mapper by clicking their name then send message.

Regards Bernard.

92133959 over 5 years ago

Hi, You inadvertently dragged part of Peckham Rye and the cycleway onto Scylla Road, I've corrected this back to original position.

I added a website for the bunker. I gather the bunker is underground so I've unjoined it from the roads and tagged as layer=-1, indicating below ground, (does it actually extend under the roads?). I changed industrial to brownfield as I think the land has yet to be developed, added historic yes amended name and description tags as per website information.

Regards Bernard.

92133783 over 5 years ago

Hi. I moved the garden off of the building.

92133574 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Features added to OSM must be factual on the ground and verifiable to everyone. It seems from description and name tags that the feature is only proposed and awaiting permission. If this is the situation then appropriate tags for now would be proposed:crop=tamarilllo (without capital letter),
proposed:landuse=farmland,
proposed:name=St. Francis Food Forest.

Regards Bernard.

91949703 over 5 years ago

Hi, Please be careful not to duplicate paths, I've just remove three duplicate sections. Two were paths drawn atop of bridges (a bridge is a highway same as the path), and path atop path at the church.
I also moved/unjoined the path from the lake outline, (the path line is the highway centerline drawn atop the lake outline means the path is half in the water).

Regards Bernard.

91884708 over 5 years ago

Hi,
This section of path you've added, Way: Southdowns Way (854341107), is placed atop of existing highways and as such is duplication, (path on top of road). The route Southdowns Way, both hiking:-relation/77976 and mtb:-relation/5881, is mapped utilising the existing highways.
I've removed the duplication highway.

If you could have a look at those routes you'll see how they are made up from existing sections of highways.

Regards Bernard.

91947561 over 5 years ago

Hi, Like the oneway=no, covered=no is implied by it's absence. Thus these two negative tags are not needed here.
Regards Bernard.

91947502 over 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to let you know that in the absence of tag oneway=no OSM usually takes it that there is not a oneway restriction. Thus it's not necessary to tag a highway with oneway=no except in special circumstances, which this is not.

Regards Bernard

91906600 over 5 years ago

Hi, I've removed a duplicated section of path. Regards Bernard.

91477412 over 5 years ago

OK no response and no correction so I've amended it as best I can from imagery.
Regards Bernard.

91464497 over 5 years ago

OK, area now tagged.