Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The OSM tag internet_access is not meant for public access sites not those places limited to student access, please see :- internet_access=*

Thus I've removed those tags and added a note to describe WLAN access. I removed the boundary as it's not relevant. I placed the POI data on the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's OSM practice when a feature needs amending/correcting to do this to the existing feature if possible. Thus all history of the feature is maintained.

Your new paths were placed on-top of existing highways. I've remove the duplicated sections of way, keeping the updated tags.

Regards Bernard.

Tweak path and field lines, add bridge, join stiles to path line.

A few tweaks to buildings and paths.

Generator reinstated to relation that was inadvertently removed.

Hi, Please see here for golf features tagging :- leisure=golf_course

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Do you need the two building joined into one building with the same overall outline? I can do it for you if you wish.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I likely didn't see, change all that needed changing.

The references are the LIL 4/2 which are County Council references. They usually mean Parish, path number, path section number, (or something like that). If a path has a formal name by all means tag it as well as the ref number.

If I can help further please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you must be mistaken at least on some of your tags. Access=no, there must be some access here as motor vehicles can clearly be seen on Bing imagery. Your tags bicycle, foot, horse, motor_vehicle=no means no access by these means either public or private. Could you please state the source of this information? Also can this be verified as per :- osm.wiki/Verifiability ?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say this changeset has made many duplications of highways, (highways mapped on top of existing highways). Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/y6mtyvz5
If you need to amend or correct a way please correct the existing way not draw another way atop the existing.

Because the duplication is extensive and there are route relations involved it might be best to revert this changeset entirely. You can then start afresh with any corrections.

Need help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your data and updating are valuable but some of it is inadvertently duplicating existing data/features. I've removed some duplicate POI and data, updated data on area outlines as per OSM practice. I placed the camp site entrance on the highway.

Your three Bird Sactuary POI's don't really make sense from an OSM data view. The walkway is not on a walking way nor looks like a viewpoint, (just the side of a road). The Bird Sanctuary Parking free node is not tagged as parking nor does it look like a viewpoint. I can't figure out what you might mean here so I can't help with amendments on these features.

Regards Bernard.

Also removed duplicate sections of ways and made amendments at other bridge sites.

Hi ref ways 840567188 culvert and 840567186 bridge. There's not both a bridge and a culvert, one or the other. The Bing imagery clearly shows a bridge. So I've removed the culvert.

Ref ways 840567184 and 840567182 two bridges one atop the other, duplication? The bridge seems to be a public footpath over a stream with no evidence of an old railway, so I've removed bridge way/840567182.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I notice that your new buildings, (Ways :- 840233969, 840233970, 840233971, 840233972, 840233968) are drawn over existing building outlines. There are, (see above warnings) many warnings of crossing buildings so there are likely more problems than I've stated.
The existing buildings have more info than your new outlines. your new outlines seem not to match the Bing imagery. It's a usual practice in OSM to correct or amend existing features, thus keeping all change history.

Could you have a look here please?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

These residendial areas are within an already mapped residential area multipolygon, Way: 43087098. Thus being duplication I've removed them.

Regards Bernard.

Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to let you know this changeset deleted 50 features. Please be very careful and check the changes you're uploading.

I've reverted both of your changesets to reinstate all the deleted features. If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I found the proposal page and agree yes only the one is emergency vehicles.

This page explains the emergency tag :- emergency=*
emergency=yes would be appropriate.

If you need help please just ask, Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are these road status changes actually prohibiting emergency and/or service vehicles? As you've tagged them there is no access for emergency and service vehicles.

Regards Bernard.

Corrected a few path problems

Many corrections made here.