Hi, The church graveyard is one area and includes the church as well. The same applies to the cemetery, the whole area is the cemetery including paths, car park and chapel.
You have deleted these main features and the line of the public footpath.
Could you please rectify these problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've disconnected your joining the path to an area outline.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, the recreation area Millennium Woodland is already mapped as a multipolygon with the recreation feature tagged on the outer area. So I've removed the duplicated area Millennium Woodland (827637963, v2)

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You are overlapping areas of landuse with the same value (landuse=residential overlapping landuse=residential).
Also placing leisure=park on top of landuse=residential the area is either a park or residential.
Also joining landuse to the centreline of highways, usually landuse does not extend to the centre of highways.

Could you please look to remedy these problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your changes resulted in the deletion of a landuse area are the misalignment of a road and bridge. I could not see that you actually added anything so I've reverted your changes to the original map state.
If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've redrawn your building to better match Bing imagery, terraced it into four houses which looks right. Then placed your house into the block with your tags.

I removed the name which I think is your personal description rather than the house formal name, (not a good thing anyway to put personal info into OSM). I also removed the height=30 tag. OSM uses meters to tag heights, I doubt the house is 30 meters high. You can always correct/add info if my assumptions are wrong.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed the access=no tag because access is allowed on the footpath as per your foot and bicycle tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, If the church is used it be tagged with amenity=place_of_worship
religion=christian

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I've removed the self intersection from your water area polygon Way: 825715094. Tagged the islet and created a multipolygon of the water and islet.
I noticed you've made similar self intersections in the past, perhaps you could in the future use this method to show similar features.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Andy,
The reference to a public footpath was in the tag name=Public Footpath on the way that I removed and the tag name=PF on a node which was also removed.
The path I determined to be a public footpath was determined by looking at OS explorer map. So without first hand knowledge I did not add that info. That path is Lancastrians mapping and tagging being the extension at north of Dacre's Bridge Lane. I did remove the tag name=To Dcares Bridge Lane believing it to be not the formal name.

If Lancastrian knows the status of the footpath to be public he could add designation=public_footpath.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You somehow inadvertently dragged a few highways out of position and duplicated sections of the footpath you added. I've repositioned the highways and amended the paths as best I can.
Please don't add fiction names (Public Footpath is not a name). There's only one short public footpath I can determine here extending Dacre's Bridge Lane.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for your quick response to my query.
For your bicycle question the tag is oneway:bicycle=no I don't think that's supported on the editor you're using so I've added it. Hope that's OK.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just checking, are you sure you've got the oneway direction correct, has it been changed in the last year or two? Reason being is the Bing imagery shows vehicles going/facing the other way.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, There were more footpaths around here, do you have more information, did you just walk to that point and back again? Was your walk from Norwich Road, A1062? If so is the path on the farm track from the road or fenced in around the field edge?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You connected the south-east end of the path to an administrative boundary line, placing a highway crossing point there.
The boundary isn't a physical feature so the path ought not join onto it, the path as drawn does not cross another highway here so the can't be a highway crossing point.
I've made a correction un-joining the path from the boundary line and removing the crossing.

Regards Bernard.

OK, thanks for your response. I've made the corrections but it really is simplicity to map correctly in the first place.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
More duplications of major highway sections.
Way: 823423950, Way: 823423947 and Way: 823423942 placed on top of existing highway.

I've removed the duplicates.

Hi,
You made a duplication of a major highway, this could disrupt routing.
Way: SH79 (824738712) was placed on top of Way: SH79 (824035370)

I have deleted the duplication but please be careful not to make these duplications. You were warned of the problem, (see above "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway")

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Your POI is located over the town council building. I think it should be over the building where Andy's Angling Centre is, that's number 19.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You have the building drawn over a wall.