Hi, Yes intersection is OK.

Hi I removed duplicated sections of path and bridge.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know. It looks like you and @SK53 were mapping this camp site at the same time resulting in a few duplications.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know. It looks like you and @trigpoint were mapping this camp site at the same time resulting in a few duplications.
Regards Bernard.

Nice work Phil, thanks for making the few changes.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, The definitive line of Way: 329931833 at the north east may well go through a house swimming pool and gardens but that is not necessarily ground truth. By all means mark the definitive path line but mark also the obstructions so folk know they can't walk there, or tag as highway=no on that section. It would also be great if any alternative way is used to overcome the obstructions.

I've amended several path lines, water lines, woods lines and joined crossing highways.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Great to see more paths added to the map. You tag this track as permissive but that does not inform the public as to what access is permitted, perhaps you might add foot=permissive. It might be more accurate to tag access=agriculture, foot=permissive.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
As you say this is on the OS map, it's a footpath therefore cycles are not allowed as a right. Thus bicycle=yes is incorrect. Permissive cycling would have to be by express permission of the landowner.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, The features tagged operator=Bt, the operator refers to it's self as BT (two capital letters), cold you please rectify these instances?

You refer to several utility poles as material=wood:ruian:type:ruian:type, should these be just material=wood? If so could you amend instances please.
Regards Bernard.

Sorry but your tagging of the fire hydrant Node: Fire Hydrant (7455836707) is incorrect.
I'm certain the hydrant does not have a formal name so that's fiction and should be removed.
The tag Fire_hydrant:type=underground=Sluice valve is not recognised by OSM (capital letters should not be used in this tag). Tags describing this feature more precisely are emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=underground
water=sluice_valve

Could you please amend the hydrants you've addded?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, does the permissive path Way: 796573935 to the west of the canal really exist?

I've tidied the paths and canal up so the paths don't cross onto the water.

Hi, I've drawn the buildings and transferred the info from POI to building. Allow a little while to let the routers update and try routing.
The buildings are not yet rendering but OSM can already find Sayers Court, Colchester and Lexden Place, Colchester.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Is the defibrillator accessible by the public from the road? If so it ought not be tagged as indoors as this indicates it is not accessible by the general passing public.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Review request, very good. Try the Maxar imagery from the (shortcut B) in iD editor for better clarity.

Regards Bernard.

I've now reconstructed this route from the original existing sections of highways. As you can see the route is made all from existing highways without the need for adding untagged ways.

Regards Bernard.

By placing a path on top of a tertiary road you're duplicating ways, thus disrupting routeing. Please follow the correct procedure to map route relations.

This route has been drawn on top of existing highways.
For route relations using sections of existing highways the existing highway should be sectioned up to allow the existing highway sections to be added to the route relation. If necessary the existing highway sections can have tags amended. Thus you can know the type of highway and conditions/restrictions of each section of the route. Also the length of a section on a particular highway, (how long the bad patches are).

Forgot the link :-relation/11043684#map=15/53.5055/-2.7753

Hi Phil,
I've amended the problems with duplicated crossing ways and created a route relation for the Rainford Linear Park path. It doesn't appear yet needs a little time.
Regards Bernard.

Hello AMWS,
My apologies, (some folk do just change things for their own purposes and one can't tell genuine changes). I did wait awhile before making amendments.
Can I just add when you draw a new path please join it to all other highways it crosses over, thus completing the network.

Regards Bernard.