Hi, I've made amendments to the tracks, streams, ford, added bridges. This as best I can from imagery.

Hi, Why remove the grass area? Probably a mistake. I've reinstated it for you.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Are those footpaths really there?

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wondered if the path just stops at the back of the farm.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Could you please show that this is actually a formal shared use cycleway rather that a footpath? I can find no reference to it being a cycleway.

Secondly, whatever it's designation/use there are problems with the mapping. At the north end there is a self-intersection of the way. Then for most of it's length it criss crosses over Ifield Avenue, sometimes joining onto it sometimes not. At the south end near a mini roundabout you've made a self-intersection to Ifield Avenue. The footpath is actually set back from the road in places substantially.

Looking at the Crawley Council cycleway map the official cycleway route from the south ends near this mini roundabout.

So whether the cycleway is official or not there are several problems that need addressing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There was no need for a multipolygon relation for the smaller building, it only unnecessarily bloats the database. I've removed the relation and tagged building=yes.

Regards Bernard.

Remove in my Changeset: 83720578

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your cafe is situated in the middle of a grass area. Your changeset comment mentions a test. I think what you've actually done is inadvertently add fiction to our live worldwide database, thus I'll remove the cafe POI. If I'm wrong I apologise and will put it back.

If you need help mapping genuine features please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Thanks!

Please don't join areas to power lines.

Hi, There's no need to delete any names, that is just removing genuinely correct data from OSM. When you wish to amend a name to Welsh please change the English name tag from name=??? to name:en=Cowbridge Road.
Thus adding instead of distracting from our database. This is after all a worldwide database so everyone should be equally catered for.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
That street does not seem to be Hill View, it's Ermine Street. Also, the house doesn't look like a tourist apartment. Are you sure you've got this right?
Regards Bernard.

No response so I'll change the name tag to ref tag

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the following three ways because you had duplicated existing ways. If a way needs amending please amend the existing way (don't delete or duplicate it) thus the history of the original way is maintained in the OSM data.
Way: LA7/43/30 (791477653)
Way: LA7/43/40 (791477654)
Way: LA7/4/10 (791477655)
Way: LA7/34/10 (791477649)

I've also changed the names you added to ref=???. These are reference numbers used by the highway authority, not names.Otherwise good work.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure there's only one bridge support and close to one end of the bridge?One support would logically be in the center.

Also I've removed your new Way: 791390057 as it duplicated an existing highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Way: Woodbridge School Field (200912372) is a recreation ground, it is not an amenity=school. The amenity tag is on the school grounds overall outline, within which the recreation area is. I've capitalised the name and amended the tagging to suit OSM tagging.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've reverted the changes.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended your natural=wood tag to natural=tree as these look like individual trees rather than a wood area. They now render properly.
I also tweaked some of the golf feature tagging to suit :- leisure=golf_course

Regards Bernard.

Hi Bruce, I accept your reasoning. But as the way was mapped and tagged anyone using OSM data derived map or routing would not be guided up there to the Pavilion as there was a footpath (pedestrian access only) section to restrict going onto the park. So anyone doing as you say would be acting against what OSM data shows. OSM data must be ground truth data, not data presented to give a personal desire.
Actually I think there is a barrier on this way before it joins the path on the edge of the park. But from the Bing image I can't quite make out what it is.

Hi, Please don't delete and redraw an area when it only needs for the original area to be amended. This action loses all te OSM history associated with the originally mapped feature.
Regards Bernard.