Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
From available imagery your footpath looks like its a cycleway, it certainly joins to cycleways at both ends. Could you check this please and if necessary amend the tagging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Mac, That's what I though as well but I couldn't work out quite what done. I temporarily reverted the changeset but was still no wiser. Please post a comment here if you work out what caused the anomalies.
Regards Bernard.

Fiction name removed, Test area already removed.

Untagged node removed, please don't use this live database for testing.
Thank You.

Hi, Can you have a look at cycleways Way: 673049034, Way: 673049022 and Way: 673049028 please, it look like somethings gone wrong.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Re review request, I've removed lots of excess nodes and squared up the buildings. Perhaps if you zoom in closer you could map a little more precisely. Apart from that it's a pretty good first go.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Pretty good first addition to OSM.
I just made a few adjustments at the recreation ground areas, removed playground within playground. Tagged the garden as access=private so they don't get tourists visiting. Also tagged car parks as surface and the pub car park as access=customers.
There's a lot to learn and that was good.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've squared up these features, tagged them as buildings and removed isolated dwelling tags

Hi, I removed this road as it was a duplication of the existing highway.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
When adding routes in a lot of places you are actually duplicating highways by placing a new highway on-top of an existing highway. Thus disrupting routeing.
Also the new route sections on top of existing highways not tagged as highway are not recognised as highways in the route relation.
For route relations using sections of existing highways the existing highway should be sectioned up to allow the existing highway sections to be added to the route relation. If necessary the existing highway sections can have tags amended.
I have amended some relations and removed duplications. Please check your route relations and pleas do not create more duplications.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you inadvertently duplicated part of the footpath. I've removed the the duplicated section.
I also changed the name tag to a ref tag. The barrier Node: 2188886972 to stile, (you can't have a gate and stile at the same position, if there are two features side by side they should be mapped as such).

All is now OK, thanks for adding to OSM.

Regards Bernard.

OK, I've now rectified the anomalies as best I can.

Hi, you've added a lot of feature here without tagging them. As such they are of no use or value to OSM.
Regards Bernard.

Also tagged solar panels and remove name tag.

Hi, I tagged the area as commercial as without a usage tag it won't render.

Hi,
I've removed an inadvertantly duplicate village area Killin and a duplicated track Auchmore Road.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Just wanted to let you know I removed the joining of stream to bridge, (the bridge is over the stream not joined to it), and amended the layer tags to suit OSM practice.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
No need to duplicate name so I've remove the name from the area as the house is named on the building.
For the bridge please don't create duplicate ways, if a way needs amending please amend the existing way. Thus history is maintained, no duplication, no strange routeing.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've moved several of your landuse areas off of highway center lines. I'm sure housing and car parks do not extend over secondary roads.
Mapping in this way (area, highway and other feature outline in the exact same position), makes it very difficult to correct problems that might have occurred. It's even difficult for the mapper to see if they are making mistakes.
You made a self intersection on way/785161670, v1 which I've managed to unpick and correct.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've added layer=-2
tunnel=culvert to the 1.62km stream (Way: 583442282), if this is inadvertent could you please correct it or ask for help doing so.
You've added bridge=yes, layer=1 to the 55m path Way: 311961559.
You've added a tunnel layer=-1 to Way: Farthingale Lane (785069551).
Regarding Way: 785069544 service road, should this be a footway?
From your mapping Way: 785069543 is a bridge over a tunnel, is this correct?

I've pointed these problems out so that you can see the mistakes, hopefully correct them and avoid repeating them.

Regards Bernard.