BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 70810357 | over 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've amended your opening hours to suit OSM best practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 70808012 | over 6 years ago | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I made a few amendments to your tagging to better meet OSM practices. Also added a few things. Regards Bernard. |
| 70746616 | over 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you map how this footpath crosses the stream please? Is it by a bridge or perhaps a stream? Regards Bernard. |
| 70552662 | over 6 years ago | I've now returned the dragged ways. |
| 70619057 | over 6 years ago | Hi Richard, OK that's reverted to the original state. Regards Bernard |
| 69832986 | over 6 years ago | I've now rectified the problems. |
| 70399730 | over 6 years ago | OK no response so I've corrected the ways for you. Regards Bernard. |
| 70622632 | over 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've inadvertently un-joined several highways in the Canfield Fair Grounds area. This will result in very strange routing. If you need help just ask. Regards Bernard |
| 70619057 | over 6 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I would like to just point out that there is more to OSM than might meet the eye of a new contributor. Highways are usually in sections for reasons that might not be apparent. In the case of Nettledon Road only the northern section was part of the route relation Chilterns Cycleway (1019329). When you joined the two sections you inadvertently added the south section of Nettledon Road to the route relation. Thus adding a fictitious cul-de-sac section to the route. I've left your alteration so you can see what has happened. It would be best to revert the changeset rather than make further alterations, I can do the reverting if you wish. If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 70552662 | over 6 years ago | Hi Rhyzter, Yes welcome to OpenStreetMap. I can see from the DigitalGlobe Vivid Imagery that this area has recently changed dramatically with buildings removed and housing added. This would account for the previous comment about objects being removes. (The bing imagery still shows the grass areas and footpath.) However you have inadvertantly dragged two ways out of their original shape,Way: 252930591 and Way: 252559547. Lastly if the road names are all Eastside quarter then both words should be capitalised. Regards Bernard. |
| 70575390 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
I removed the tag name=Consum because that name is used on the POI Node: Consum (6131351776) and is not likely to be the formal name of the whole plot. My apologies for my comment "remove fiction", I doubt the tagging was intentional fiction. If I've made a mistake here please be specific and I'll attempt to remedy it. Regards Bernard. |
| 70575440 | over 6 years ago | Hi, I've answered on Changeset: 70575491. Regards Bernard. |
| 70575491 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
These three areas are within a greater area tagged landuse=residential, thus tagging the tree as landuse=residential is duplication. My apologies for my comment "remove fiction", I doubt the tagging was intentional fiction. If I've made a mistake here please be specific and I'll attempt to remedy it. Regards Bernard. |
| 70345307 | over 6 years ago | Removed oneway=no tag as if there isn't a oneway tag at all implies the highway is twoway. |
| 67750763 | over 6 years ago | Your fiction is removed. |
| 67750922 | over 6 years ago | Hi. Your fiction has been removed. |
| 70513768 | over 6 years ago | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You inadvertently have conflicting data on the building levels.
Regards Bernard. |
| 68761233 | over 6 years ago | Hi, You had joined the two Broadland Northway roads to both of the above Cromer Road bridges, thus making a join of the bridge to the underneath road. I just wanted to let you know that this is incorrect. I've removed the joining nodes so all is now well again. Regards Bernard. |
| 70336734 | over 6 years ago | Hi, I don't use anything but JOSM on a PC for editing as it is by far the best most comprehensive editor available. That said I think GoMap looks good, https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/go-map/id592990211?mt=8 I've added grassland to the park relation outline. Also a few tweaks to areas. Regards Bernard.
|
| 69833302 | over 6 years ago | Someone removed one of the highways, I'm not sure if it's correct but the duplication is removed. |