OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
70810357 over 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended your opening hours to suit OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard.

70808012 over 6 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I made a few amendments to your tagging to better meet OSM practices. Also added a few things.

Regards Bernard.

70746616 over 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you map how this footpath crosses the stream please? Is it by a bridge or perhaps a stream?

Regards Bernard.

70552662 over 6 years ago

I've now returned the dragged ways.

70619057 over 6 years ago

Hi Richard, OK that's reverted to the original state.

Regards Bernard

69832986 over 6 years ago

I've now rectified the problems.

70399730 over 6 years ago

OK no response so I've corrected the ways for you.

Regards Bernard.

70622632 over 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've inadvertently un-joined several highways in the Canfield Fair Grounds area. This will result in very strange routing. If you need help just ask.

Regards Bernard

70619057 over 6 years ago

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I would like to just point out that there is more to OSM than might meet the eye of a new contributor. Highways are usually in sections for reasons that might not be apparent. In the case of Nettledon Road only the northern section was part of the route relation Chilterns Cycleway (1019329). When you joined the two sections you inadvertently added the south section of Nettledon Road to the route relation. Thus adding a fictitious cul-de-sac section to the route.

I've left your alteration so you can see what has happened. It would be best to revert the changeset rather than make further alterations, I can do the reverting if you wish.

If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

70552662 over 6 years ago

Hi Rhyzter, Yes welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I can see from the DigitalGlobe Vivid Imagery that this area has recently changed dramatically with buildings removed and housing added. This would account for the previous comment about objects being removes. (The bing imagery still shows the grass areas and footpath.)

However you have inadvertantly dragged two ways out of their original shape,Way: 252930591 and Way: 252559547.

Lastly if the road names are all Eastside quarter then both words should be capitalised.

Regards Bernard.

70575390 over 6 years ago

Hi,
I removed the tag building:levels=2 as this area is not a building, it's a plot of land with a building on it.

I removed the tag name=Consum because that name is used on the POI Node: Consum (6131351776) and is not likely to be the formal name of the whole plot.

My apologies for my comment "remove fiction", I doubt the tagging was intentional fiction. If I've made a mistake here please be specific and I'll attempt to remedy it.

Regards Bernard.

70575440 over 6 years ago

Hi, I've answered on Changeset: 70575491.

Regards Bernard.

70575491 over 6 years ago

Hi,
Those three areas are not the outlines of buildings. A polygon feature tagged as building=house or building=terrace I would be the actual building footprint, not the outline of the plot of land the building stands on.

These three areas are within a greater area tagged landuse=residential, thus tagging the tree as landuse=residential is duplication.

My apologies for my comment "remove fiction", I doubt the tagging was intentional fiction. If I've made a mistake here please be specific and I'll attempt to remedy it.

Regards Bernard.

70345307 over 6 years ago

Removed oneway=no tag as if there isn't a oneway tag at all implies the highway is twoway.

67750763 over 6 years ago

Your fiction is removed.

67750922 over 6 years ago

Hi. Your fiction has been removed.

70513768 over 6 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently have conflicting data on the building levels.
The tag building:levels=5 on Way: 445299207 is actually a duplication and ought be removed. It deems parts of the building to have two levels (4 and 5, and the level 5 in part being tagged twice).

Regards Bernard.

68761233 over 6 years ago

Hi, You had joined the two Broadland Northway roads to both of the above Cromer Road bridges, thus making a join of the bridge to the underneath road. I just wanted to let you know that this is incorrect. I've removed the joining nodes so all is now well again.

Regards Bernard.

70336734 over 6 years ago

Hi, I don't use anything but JOSM on a PC for editing as it is by far the best most comprehensive editor available. That said I think GoMap looks good, https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/go-map/id592990211?mt=8

I've added grassland to the park relation outline. Also a few tweaks to areas.

Regards Bernard.

69833302 over 6 years ago

Someone removed one of the highways, I'm not sure if it's correct but the duplication is removed.