That was changeset/174514219

When I realised what I'd done, I reverted the changeset.

Hi, Way: 1448479823 duplicated an existing highway, so I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, you dragged a couple of roads out of alignment, joining them to the turn circle. I've corrected them, so all's OK now.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the following stated highways all had duplicated sections, five warnings were given above about this problem. Duplicating sections of highways will disrupt routing and should be avoided. I've removed the duplicated sections.
Way: 1448453646, Way: 1448453657, Way: 1448453648, Way: 407920854, Way: 314988752

Uploading changesets that involve so many (142) feature edits means that you nor anyone else can easily see any problems. It's best to limit changesets to 20 or less edited features. Thus you can more easily see any mistakes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm just letting you know that someone removed the node/point that you added to OSM because it held no information. Thus of no value to the OSM database. OSM is a live worldwide database containing ground truth information.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Three sections of duplicated highway in this changeset which I've corrected/removed.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Regarding 73 Southfield Road and the tag addr:housename=73 Southfield Road, the name is not 73 Southfield Road nor is it 73, it has no name. The dwelling is an end terrace house not a semi-detached house. also the city is London not "London Borough of Ealing".

The above-mentioned points also pertain to numbers 71, 69, 67, 65, 63, 61, and 59.

Lastly the dwellings a terraced houses, they are joined by party walls. There are no gaps between them.

I've made amendments so that the terrace is mapped to OSM practice. I hope you can see/understand what I've done. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be more careful in your mapping.

This highway duplicates existing highways and would not have many illogical tags, (highway, waterway, railway).

Thus, I've reverted it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tags you added to the school building were already on the school grounds outline as per OSM practice. Thus I've removed the duplicated info from the building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new highway Carella Way was joined to the power line. I've unjoined it so folk won't be shocked!

Regards Bernard.

Childish fiction removed.

Fiction removed from name.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, you made quite a few mistakes here, as indicated by the warnings given above. The unjoined crossing highways and many duplicated sections of highways are particularly problematic as they would disrupt routing.

I think I've fixed all the highway problems, but several more minor problems likely remain.

Please take care when mapping or correcting highways. Please don't duplicate any highways or sections of highways. Please don't cross a highway over another without joining them.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Address tags corrected.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you new highway are all duplicating existing highways which could disrupt routing. Thus I've reverted the changeset, all is now OK.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new path line duplicated the existing path line and it doubled back on itself.

The path does exist but it was wrongly positioned. I've removed your duplicated line and corrected the existing path to it's correct position a little further north.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Google Earth is copyrighted so we must not use it's images to map to OSM. The road is on the imagery available to OSM so I've mapped the road to the line on Bing imagery.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Jan,
I've now looked at the whole junction layout and there are anomalies, I'll try to explain the logic I assume.

The 4 sections of ref N44, (Way: Leidsestraatweg (7471615), Way: Rijksstraatweg (1216487071), Way: Leidsestraatweg (59002595) and Way: Rijksstraatweg (7471605), are the bottom layer, I've changed from layer=-1 to layer= 0, no tag as this is implied in the absence of the layer tag.

Way: 860437191, Way: 964339476, Way: 964339481, Way: Zijdeweg (860477018), Way: Zijdeweg (860437189), Way: 964339486 and Way: Zijdeweg (860437193) are all correctly tagged as layer=1 (above the N44 way sections mentioned above).

The bridge sections, Way: 328255383, Way: Landscheidingsweg (127838915) and Way: Landscheidingsweg (127838916), are above everything mentioned in the two paragraphs above. I've changed these ways from layer=1 to layer=2.

Could you please review the changes? In case I've made a mistake the changeset is here:- changeset/173744079

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed the tags.