Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
For the bridleway there is a discrepancies between what is mapped in OSM and what appears on the Ordnance survey map. I think an on the ground survey is required. Even if the definitive line cannot be used it is still a highway.

For the gate again the same discrepancies between maps. I would suggest you might find the gated track is not a right of way (it may have actually been used as a bridleway though). Information on other maps show the not to be a bridleway here at the gate. There is shown a bridleway heading north from Epping Road about 400 feet to the west. Also a footpath about 300 feet to the east. An on the ground survey is needed before putting the ways on OSM

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out that it is recommended to map the footway/sidewalk as a property of the street if the sidewalk is just attached with a kerb and not separated by a road verge or other barriers.
Regards Bernard

Hello Phil, I actually only adjusted the outline to better reflect what I saw on the Bing image regarding the street car parking. A well known web site shows the area looking much like a park. I've searched the web and find that Corner Pin is the old name for a much larger area to the south now built up with housing. I can not find any reference online to the area concerned being either a park or village green. I did find one reference, that the clock tower/war memorial address is given as Village Green, Newport Road, ( https://www.warmemorialsonline.org.uk/memorial/215822 ). Theres nothing on the MK map of openspaces ( https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/leisure-tourism-and-culture/parks-and-open-spaces/play-areas ). As it looks like a park I'd leave it as such but would understand if you think it should be a village green. Regards Bernard

The area can have landuse and leisure tags at the same time.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The area can have landuse and leisure tags at the same time. Do you know the name?

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see the alteration you made to a section of the Jubilee Line is changing the layer from -3 to -5. I wonder how you came to this decision as the adjacent sections of the line remain at layer=-3, thus indicating a step of two layers? Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended the address and opening tags to suit OSM best practice. Regards Bernard

Forgot to say if you need help/advice about splitting a road/way just ask.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
If you are sure of the 20mph zone then the section between the two that you have amended also needs to be amended.

My observation on the internet indicate that the 20mph zone is from a point about 80m south of Salhouse Road, to a point south of Lishman Road roughly middle of where the woods are beside Woodside Road.
Regards

Hello there, The pub is tagged disused=pub, (your tag of 2010). Then doily17 added back the tag amenity=pub on 13-4-17. I initially only re-positioned the node 14-4-17.

I've now amended the tag amenity=pub to disused:amenity=pub. There should now be no confusion, disused stated twice.

Regards Bernard

Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've tidied up the buildings and removed the fiction parks.

Removed duplication of the street.

What is the area, unless stated it is meaningless?

Hello you made several duplicate ways of some of these footpaths, (either doubling back when drawing a way or actually drawing the new way on top of a section of already drawn way). I think I've removed all duplicates. Duplication thus fouls up routeing. Regards Bernard

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you got a bit awry with your first mapping. I've removed the address tags from Oak Drive and reverted it back to an unclassified highway, (it's not residential as you tagged it).
Also I've added the address for Simonds onto the building outline so folk will know the whole building is Simonds. I added website and phone as well.
The above amendments to meet OSM standard best practice.
Regards & Thanks Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Mapped as they are your three premises are taken as being the whole building (top to bottom). It is more usual for this type of premises to be on the ground floor only. Thus one would tag the whole building with tags indicating the main purpose of the building, placing shops as nodes (POI) in appropriate positions within the building outline. Please look at how this is done just to the west.
Regards Bernard

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your crossings are not done to OSM standard practice and as such do not make much sense. Please read up a bit on how to add data to OSM before making more additions. You could even look at how similar features have already been mapped.

Your additions so far need to be corrected or removed. I don't use the iD editor but would help out if you want, please just ask.
Regards

Hi, heck of a lot of self intersections on lots of these water way outlines, also some do not take account of existing water features (streams) or paths. Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/m8h54pe

Hello Rowland, just wanted to let you know that you've made a lot of self intersections to some of these building outlines. (Some joined at corners where they should be separated, others have outlines joined to courtyards.) Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/kbkwt69

No response so node removed

Hello, There's no need to remove descriptive tags for areas when you make amendments. If the tag is still relevant please leave it.
I've reinstated several tags you removed as they are still relevant.
Regards Bernard