BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 149038391 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, All the new roads you added are duplications which I've removed. Duplicated highways disrupt routing, please be careful not to duplicate highways. Regards Bernard. |
| 149046655 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, It's more common for building angles to be fairly square. Angles can easily be squared up with the iD editor. To "Square all corners" left click on the outline and select/click the square shaped icon, (third one down). Regards Bernard. |
| 149038321 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Duplicated highways were removed as per the previous review. Please amend the existing highway if it is needed. Regards Bernard. |
| 149038263 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Review, you've placed these four footpaths on top of existing highways (roads). It's not correct to have highways on top of each other it disrupts routing. If a way needs correcting it's OSM practice to amend/correct the existing way, thus keeping history of way changes. In the case of these duplications I assume you wanted to state that pedestrian use was allowed on these roads. It is usually implied that pedestrians in the absence of a restriction can use a residential or unclassified highway. If it were not so you could merely add the tag foot=yes to the road, no need for a footpath. Thus I've removed the four footpaths, you can add foot=yes to the roads if you think it is necessary. Regards Bernard. |
| 149039817 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, The wood area Way: 1265432899 doesn't really extend over several highways, that would make driving very difficult. Nor would the outline be a self-intersecting line. So I've made slight amendments. Regards Bernard. |
| 149046574 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've placed the park tag on the area Way: Chiltern Green (50827525). Regards Bernard. |
| 149042515 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I just wanted to let you know that in most circumstances (like this) in the absence of a oneway tag, it is assumed and implied that the highway is not oneway. Thus in this situation, oneway=no is not needed, it can be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 148976064 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Sorry to have to say that there's lots of mapping around here that is not to OSM best practice. Incorrect house names, duplicated highways, highways not connected, Incorrect car park tagging, and many unnecessary nodes. Regards Bernard. |
| 148840287 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, You've got a ferry route Way: 1263948817 on top of a highway Way: 1263948814 which cannot be correct. Was the ferry line supposed to be a bridge? Or is it a ferry, not a road? In any case the problem needs to be corrected. Regards Bernard. |
| 148632733 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, You're making a lot of duplicated highways here by placing a highway on top of another highway. This could disrupt routing. I think I've now removed all the duplicate sections. Please try to be sure this doesn't happen. Regards Bernard. |
| 148702970 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. These ways are as you said above are footpaths. A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized. Thus I've changed the tag to highway=footway. Regards Bernard. |
| 148645209 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, The areas seem to be mainly grass so I would leave it as landuse=grass and map the flowerbeds within the grass area. The tag landuse=flowerbed is only a proposal, though it has been used thousands of times. Regards Bernard. |
| 148697415 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. That would not be a residential highway at the end of a service road. Thus I've removed it. Regards Bernard. |
| 148646155 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, I just wanted to point out that you added the tag highway=path to a 28km long residential area outline Way: 798908748. It would be a great addition to the footpath network but very difficult to walk. So I've removed the tag. Regards Bernard. |
| 148645209 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. These green spaces are not really garden:type=community
Regards Bernard. |
| 148298018 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, You are placing many nodes tagged liesure=park within the main park area also tagged liesure=park. As per OSM practice this is incorrect tagging. Could you please correct these park nodes. Regards Bernard. |
| 148555263 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, You've placed this highway on top of an existing highway, this duplication disrupts routing. Thus I've removed your duplication. If a way needs correcting it's OSM practice to correct any existing way, this maintains the way history. Regards Bernard. |
| 148513604 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, You need to join the crossing nodes to both of the crossing highways. I've corrected quite a few here. I also corrected the joining of several crossing highways. Regards Bernard. |
| 148509354 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, I've removed your Way: 1259775745 as it duplicates an existing highway, I've amended the existing highway to suit your new way status. I also added a gate in your new wall where the footpath goes through it. Regards Bernard. |
| 148287088 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Duplicated highway removed and tags amended to new info. Regards Bernard. |