OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
149038391 almost 2 years ago

Hi, All the new roads you added are duplications which I've removed. Duplicated highways disrupt routing, please be careful not to duplicate highways.

Regards Bernard.

149046655 almost 2 years ago

Hi, It's more common for building angles to be fairly square. Angles can easily be squared up with the iD editor. To "Square all corners" left click on the outline and select/click the square shaped icon, (third one down).

Regards Bernard.

149038321 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Duplicated highways were removed as per the previous review. Please amend the existing highway if it is needed.

Regards Bernard.

149038263 almost 2 years ago

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Review, you've placed these four footpaths on top of existing highways (roads). It's not correct to have highways on top of each other it disrupts routing. If a way needs correcting it's OSM practice to amend/correct the existing way, thus keeping history of way changes. In the case of these duplications I assume you wanted to state that pedestrian use was allowed on these roads. It is usually implied that pedestrians in the absence of a restriction can use a residential or unclassified highway. If it were not so you could merely add the tag foot=yes to the road, no need for a footpath.

Thus I've removed the four footpaths, you can add foot=yes to the roads if you think it is necessary.

Regards Bernard.

149039817 almost 2 years ago

Hi, The wood area Way: 1265432899 doesn't really extend over several highways, that would make driving very difficult. Nor would the outline be a self-intersecting line. So I've made slight amendments.

Regards Bernard.

149046574 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've placed the park tag on the area Way: Chiltern Green (50827525).

Regards Bernard.

149042515 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that in most circumstances (like this) in the absence of a oneway tag, it is assumed and implied that the highway is not oneway. Thus in this situation, oneway=no is not needed, it can be removed.

Regards Bernard.

148976064 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Sorry to have to say that there's lots of mapping around here that is not to OSM best practice.

Incorrect house names, duplicated highways, highways not connected, Incorrect car park tagging, and many unnecessary nodes.

Regards Bernard.

148840287 almost 2 years ago

Hi, You've got a ferry route Way: 1263948817 on top of a highway Way: 1263948814 which cannot be correct. Was the ferry line supposed to be a bridge? Or is it a ferry, not a road? In any case the problem needs to be corrected.

Regards Bernard.

148632733 almost 2 years ago

Hi, You're making a lot of duplicated highways here by placing a highway on top of another highway. This could disrupt routing. I think I've now removed all the duplicate sections. Please try to be sure this doesn't happen.

Regards Bernard.

148702970 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

These ways are as you said above are footpaths. A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized. Thus I've changed the tag to highway=footway.

Regards Bernard.

148645209 almost 2 years ago

Hi, The areas seem to be mainly grass so I would leave it as landuse=grass and map the flowerbeds within the grass area. The tag landuse=flowerbed is only a proposal, though it has been used thousands of times.

Regards Bernard.

148697415 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That would not be a residential highway at the end of a service road. Thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

148646155 almost 2 years ago

Hi, I just wanted to point out that you added the tag highway=path to a 28km long residential area outline Way: 798908748. It would be a great addition to the footpath network but very difficult to walk. So I've removed the tag.

Regards Bernard.

148645209 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

These green spaces are not really garden:type=community
leisure=garden as this implies the community can partake in gardening activities there. Do you think the council would allow someone to cultivate it for potatoes or a rose bed? This type of area is usually tagged as landuse=grass.

Regards Bernard.

148298018 almost 2 years ago

Hi, You are placing many nodes tagged liesure=park within the main park area also tagged liesure=park. As per OSM practice this is incorrect tagging. Could you please correct these park nodes.

Regards Bernard.

148555263 almost 2 years ago

Hi, You've placed this highway on top of an existing highway, this duplication disrupts routing. Thus I've removed your duplication. If a way needs correcting it's OSM practice to correct any existing way, this maintains the way history.

Regards Bernard.

148513604 almost 2 years ago

Hi, You need to join the crossing nodes to both of the crossing highways. I've corrected quite a few here. I also corrected the joining of several crossing highways.

Regards Bernard.

148509354 almost 2 years ago

Hi, I've removed your Way: 1259775745 as it duplicates an existing highway, I've amended the existing highway to suit your new way status. I also added a gate in your new wall where the footpath goes through it.

Regards Bernard.

148287088 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Duplicated highway removed and tags amended to new info.

Regards Bernard.