You've joined a lot of nodes together that should not be joined.

I've removed the relation that served no purpose.

I've removed the fictional motorway placed on top of another highway.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The source you state looks to be, (at least in part), copyright material, UK MOD Crown Copyright 2023. Please be aware that unless you have express permission to use this material to add to the OSM database, it would be considered a copyright infringement. Please see towards the bottom of this page:- osm.org/copyright

In this regard, it might be best to revert this whole changeset, so that no infringement can be claimed against OSM. You can then add back the features you know of, that are not gleaned from copyright material.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There is a single highway which is the service road. The service road is designated as a Public Right of Way footpath. Which means that the surface of the way is invested to the Highway Authority. The HA then has a duty of caring for the PRoW.

As far as the OSM database is concerned, it is the tags that determine the use of, or restriction of, a highway. I've added designation tags to the relevant section of the service road. Thus the service road is designated as a public footpath and foot use is specifically designated, (designation=public_footpath
foot=designated). So the designation tags show the footpath extends to Watery Lane.

I hope this explains things, need any help on anything please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Tagged the path as public, its a PRoW.

Hi, I've removed the duplicate section of highway, footpath on top of service road, and added designation tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the section of path that was on top of the service road and amended the service road tags to suit the public footpath.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated section of highway as it disrupts routing. There is no highway named Waterville Gardens, that name refers to the group of dwellings.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please do not use descriptions as formal names. Also most of most of these highways are actually divisions between rice or paddy fields. Could you please amend or correct your mapping?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, These do not look like unclassified highways. There are a small number of paths but mostly these are the dividing lines of rice fields. On the imagery the darker lines are streams or irrigation ditches. Leaving these as unclassified highways is going to disrupt routing, thus they ought be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, New paths look good.

I've removed the access=no tag, as there is foot access on a footpath. On a highway=footpath vehicle access is denied by routers (unless expressly stated like access=agricultural), so no need to tag it.

Also please be advised that the width should be stated as 0.75 rather than .75

Regards Bernard.

Repositioned node, added religion.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your new long kerb as it inadvertently crosses several buildings.

Regards Bernard.

your duplicated highway is removed.

Hi, Long lengths of duplicated highway were removed. Please, if a way needs amending/correcting do this to the existing way. Duplicate highways disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your childish fiction has been reverted.

It's very easy to add genuine objects to OSM. Need any help please just ask.

Regards.

Duplicated highway and very long ford removed.

Hi, The traffic mini_bumps node joined two highways, making a duplicated section of highway. So I've deleted that mini_bumps node in order to remove the duplicated highway section.

Please place the bumps correctly without disrupting routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've mapped the gardens over all the building which isn't correct, there's no garden where the buildings are situated. You could make multipolygon relations so that the buildings are inner areas of the garden. Thus the garden is not across the building area.

Regards Bernard.