No response so I've removed the tags.

I did not reply because I did not want to be a party to any argument. I'll just continue to correct any mistakes I see, especially like the highway duplication on that roundabout, that, if left, would likely disrupt routing.

If you wish to see the duplication simply revert the changeset number 139426529

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Review, your mapping looks OK. Can the football pitches now be removed? Are the roads still within the college grounds? If so ought they all be service roads?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, For absolute clarity please just revert the changesets. You'll then be able to see the changes made.

Node: 11086150764

Hi, the duplication was actually removed in my previous changeset number 139426529

Hi, Certainly, there was a one node section of Way: Frome Road (4411939) that was on top of Way: Wellsway (8406026). I joined two nodes to eliminate the duplicate section of highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Please look here to see the many duplicated sections of path you've made:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=43.39595&lat=14.55690&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

All the dark blue lines are your duplicated highways. Could you please correct your mapping and cease to duplicate highways in this manner?

Thanks.

Thanks.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I have to say that your changes do not reflect the ground truth.

This section of road is not flood prone, only the section drawn in the water is flood prone and that is tagged as a ford.

This section of road is not a ford nor a stream.

This is a tertiary road.

It is a through road for vehicles not merely destination.

There is no posted advisory maxspeed limit.

There are signs, (at Ipswich Road and the junction of Mill Lane, and Knights Lane) that are opened (by the council) to display a flood warning when appropriate.

Thus I've reverted these changes. Regards Bernard.

Hi, A lot of the buildings are out of square, partly joined, or very roughly drawn.
Some fields, and woods have gaps between them that are not ground truth. A hedge or ditch would be the boundary between fields with no gaps between the fields.

I started making corrections but this changeset is too large to easily manage. It's recommended to save little and often. There is no need for huge changesets.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, please don't join the farmland areas to the highway centerline. The farmer doesn't grow crops on the road or on verges.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, If this is an unclassified highway then how can it be a toll road? Where are the tolls collected and by whom?

Are you sure you've tagged the correct speed limit, when was it reduced to 30?

Where is the maxspeed:advisory=20 posted on this highway, because all OSM data must be verifiable?

I'm pretty sure the max-width is much more than 2.5m (8.25 feet).

The tag passing=difficult is subjective depending on the vehicle and at the passing places it's very easy.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've restored the building's shape.
Regards Bernard.

Hi stick2, Unfortunately, lots of roads were removed. I've now reinstated the roads and amended the tags to their previous state.

Regards Bernard.

OK, that's all the deleted highways reinstated and I think all the tags are reverted to the state before your first amendments. So no harm done.

Regards Bernard.

OK, that's all the deleted highways reinstated and I think all the tags are reverted to the state before your first amendments. So no harm done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Urgent!!!!!!!!

Now you're deleting the whole highway. Maybe several highways.
Please don't delete any more features, I'll try now to reinstate the deleted roads.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, is there really a 6-kilometer long ford? Could you please check and amend if necessary?

Hi, You continue to make duplicated sections of these paths. This is incorrect mapping. Please take the time to map the paths without doubling up on sections.

Regards Bernard.