This bus-stop is mapped actually some distance from the street and there is another bus-stop close by on that street. The name=studio given to the bus_stop looks suspicious as well, especially as the close by building is Studio College.
So it looks like your mapping is somewhat flawed.
Please respond and ask for help in rectifying the problem, I'll wait a while before removing the stop.
Regards

Yes welcome, I started to rectify the problems on some of the sections of path modified/added at the north of this changeset. Unfortunately I think the rest is better/easier if removed and started again. Then as they are pavements by the road separated by a kerb it could be better to map them as sidewalks of the carriageway.
Happy Daze please just ask if you need help. I take it you've read the help pages linked from the top of this page.
Regards

No response from mapper so changeset reverted.

Hello there Sam888.
Quite a few problems with the features you recently added. Would you like to have a look and maybe make adjustments, please see here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.94274&lat=53.24077&zoom=13&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way
Before I or another mapper starts putting things right.

I'm afraid you're getting to make a habit of this sort of thing. You've proved you're a good mapper, it's just a pity you can't take note of others comments on your actions.
Regards
Bernard

WARNING the link to GoaLoo may not be safe.

Hello There, OpenStreetMap is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. To include fiction in this database could cause disruption. You added a name to a residential area which looks highly suspicious so I have reverted the changes.
If you can show the name is verifiable on the ground I'll willingly replace it. Or if I can assist placing a POI for you please just ask.

I just noticed the statement on your website "We will not spam you" OK

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This building is named Belmont, you've added the name "Unique Best Man Speeches" to the building which is clearly wrong. Unique Best Man Speeches is at best a company or office within the building. If it has a physical presence at all. A POI for the company within the building outline would properly show it at 5 Cross Street not at numbers 1, 3 and 5.
Lastly OSM is not meant to be a means of advertising.
Regards

Hello Phil,

No I didn't miss it, I left it for you, please see my comment here :- changeset/45139235#map=18/51.75318/0.45146, just joking. It will always be football to me! What do you think, conform or not?

Regards Bernard

Hello this area is the pitch. The stadium is the already mapped building to the east. I've changed the tag back to pitch.
I would agree with the sport=football tag, and would use it myself, after all it is a football club. There is however a trend to call this game soccer. Regards

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you say why you placed the POI (sculpture) in the residential relation number 2919365, as I can see no need to do this. If this was inadvertent shall I remove it from the relation (it only bloats the database). Regards.

Hello there, your mapping of the three fields is very imprecise as to be almost valueless. Could you please make good these areas, you can zoom right in so as to very accurately map field boundary's.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you have a look at your new way/465160584 (highway=unclassified), it isn't joined to the A4178 at the eastern end. Logic would suggest it should be. Regards Bernard

Is there a physical, verifiable feature on the ground here with a verifiable name? If not then the point ought not be mapped as it serves no function. Please see :- osm.wiki/Verifiability
Regards

Hi, is the phone shop actually in the Jewish community centre?

No response from StarsMmd so reverted as could find no evidence in favour of the edit.

Hello, the tagging to this node can be removed as the information is mapped more fully at 173 Colney Hatch Lane to the north. This here is a duplication of part of the company information.
ref :- http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/reviews/rubbish-please-professional-rubbish-removal-in-london.324118/

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for you additions to the OSM database. Can I please draw your attention to Church Hill.

You have added a short section of highway (the length of the footway) which is actually a duplication an existing way. It's tagged ford=yes and highway=service, there would be problems tagged thus but in this case the duplicated highway ought be removed.

You have adjusted the tagging of the initial/existing Church Hill (running from the ford right through The Vale). Changing tag highway=tertiary to highway=service, this is the main road through the village so this change is clearly wrong. Also the tag ford=yes is on this whole quarter mile long section of road, clearly a mistake. (May I suggest reading :- ford=* before making alterations to a ford.) The ford, from what I can see, is already mapped correctly.

If I can assist in any way please just ask.
Regards Bernard

OK. Reverted my own changeset.

If you are saying in your changeset comment that this area is fenced then it should be tagged such. However please be more precise with the fence line and include any gaps, gates and the status of ways through the fence. Thanks.