Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've looked at your recent mapping and removed two roads that were obviously incorrectly tagged. they were also duplications of existing highways. I also corrected several names that were added as all capitals.

Please try to adhere to OSM best practices as outlined in several help pages.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The church building was already tagged and named correctly, (not using all capital letters). So there is no need for your new POI, which as a name only is of no use in OSM. Also, the link to Google Maps is not good for our totally open database.

Lastly you somehow added your POI to 6 route relations and a station.

Thus I've reverted this changeset. If you need help with anything or there is a problem please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Again duplicated highways were removed as it seriously disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed several miles of duplicated highway that you added. Please, if a way needs amending it is OSM practice to amend existing features, not merely place new features atop of existing ones.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Everywhere is private but I thought this area was a park open to the public, is it not?

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've looked at your mapping and unfortunately, there are serious problems.

There are several duplicated highways, one road placed on top of another. This seriously disrupts routing. Also, a lot of your mapped roads are tagged as oneway which seems to be illogical and again disrupts routing. Then there are several route relations that do not look correct and in any case, are incorrectly tagged. These comments likely apply to all of your mapping.

Could you please go over all your mapping and make corrections? Although I think it might be easier to revert it all and start again, perhaps after gaining a better understanding of OSM best practices.

Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, The house numbers on Barlow Road near Cleveland Avenue don't look right, some are duplicated. I think the corner house numbered 63 should be changed to 67. Then 65 should be 69, 67 should be 71, and so on up to 77. Please also note that there should then only be 6 houses on the frontage of Barlow Road, currently, there are 7 mapped, 1 to many.

If you agree, please make amendments, or I can do so if you wish. I await your response.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the huge area as it's not a townhall building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted these changes because they contain a lot of fiction as well as other problems. Please respect this live worldwide database from which many maps are made, it might someday help you.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Good Day to you as well,

Thanks for the quick response, I've now removed the fuel:diesel=no tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I know you didn't add it but there is a tag of fuel:diesel=no which seems unusual to me. Can you say if diesel is or is not sold at this fuel station, please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Duplicated highway line removed.

Hi Matthew,
The tunnel was still there, Way: West Highland Line (1171014292), it's also part of several relations. So I've retagged the tunnel section as the bridge and removed the bridge Way: 1171764240

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I doubt there is both a tunnel and a bridge at this point, you've added both. Could you remedy this please, or assure that both features exist?

I've removed the duplicated walls just to the NW of here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Again some of these buildings are bungalows, thus building=bungalow.
Some of the outlines are drawn covering several dwellings so the tag should be building=residential.
If you are not sure what type of dwelling it is then just leave it as building=yes.

Lastly please limit your changeset uploads to about twenty features. This changeset has well over 2000 objects. It's going to take a long time to check and correct where necessary all that lot.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you're going to change stuff you might as well do it right, a lot of these buildings are not houses, they're bungalows, building=bungalow would be the correct tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I took a little time sorting out several problems here, unfortunately, you've now introduced several more problems/anomalies. I list the details below, could you make amendments, please?

You now have a building (Way: 168987424) within another building (Way: 1171670872).

A garden is tagged as a building, building:levels=1 and layer=1 (a garden is usually implied (with no tag necessary) as level=0, and a garden is not a building).

There are now four features,
(Node: Sun & Beauty Studios (10885796414)
Way: 168987424
Node: 10889513964
Way: 1171495810
all tagged with the address of 147 High Street. It's OSM practice to tag one feature as one OSM element it's a good practice principle. It means one on-the-ground real world feature should be mapped with only one OSM element.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, OSM represents the real world in a worldwide database, fiction, and incorrect mapping are not allowed. You are welcome to add features that are verifiable on the ground.

Thus I've reverted your two changesets because they contained fiction and dragged features out of alignment.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You don't usually need to add oneway=no, (and certainly in these cases it's not necessary). The reason is, that in the absence of a oneway=no tag, two-way is implied.

Hi, What is the line, (Way: 1171007637), that you tag as access=private? Is it a path or road?