Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

On it's own your node is meaningless, thus of no use to the database.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I wonder if you are aware that your new road Way: Marteru - Achanta - Koderu Road (1154764575) is tagged as a 3-mile long bridge, And that for the greater part, it duplicates an existing highway. If a way needs amending it's OSM practice to amend the existing way.

I've removed the duplicated highway and long bridge.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The name is already held on the building outline as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi rskedgell,
The person is doing it again, I'm not local. Could you make more reverts and perhaps put a report to the DWG.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please observe the many warnings listed above pertaining to your mapping. There are too many to describe individually but there are fictional names, (Desire Path, Steps), duplicated sections of highway, steps on top of paths, and more.

Another big problem is the number of changes/additions/edits that this changeset contains, (116 edits all told). This makes checking for problems extremely difficult and almost impossible for a new mapper.

Anyway, I've tried to look at all the problems and have made many amendments. I've removed the names, in OSM names must be the formal names verifiable by everyone passing, not descriptions. Most importantly I've corrected all the duplicated highway sections as these problems disrupt routing.

Please limit your changeset upload to about 10 edits, that way you are warned of problems that can easily be traced and amended. And please read the help/beginners pages.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Your new section of cycleway, Way: Woolwich Road (1153840804) is placed on top of an existing cycleway, Way: 1096163329. Thus making a duplication of this section of the cycleway.
There are several routes involved so not being local I'm not able to make sure the routes are maintained when correcting the duplication. Could you please remedy the duplication?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The routes on AllTrails are nothing to do with OSM. AllTrails use OSM data as their base map and folk draw their own routes on top of that base map. No matter what the map says it won't have any effect on what some folk will do.

The Welland is nowhere near these three tracks so I came confused as to how it links with tracks four miles away. Can you point out where the ford is and the farm yard? I could then have a look at OSM data in the area.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a database only from which anyone can compile a map, it tries to be a true reflection of what is on the ground and information that can be verified. Thus I've reinstated these tracks to the database and tried to indicate through tags and the addition of gates that I can see on the imagery, that there is no public access.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked your building outlines as there are multiple buildings within each outline. If you zoom right in you should be able to see individual buildings.

Regards Bernard.

Dragged building outline restored.

Hi, No response so I've removed the duplicated highways and tweaked the paths.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Is the highway line (Way: Delhi-Sahranpur-Dehradun Expressway (1151636493)), tagged as a highway under construction actually an intended motorway and a very long bridge? If not it should be removed.

The imagery seems to show that it's not needed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently dragged the driveway out of alignment which I've corrected. To mark a highway as private just add the tag access=private.

Need help just ask. Regards Bernard,

Hi, There's a couple of things wrong here. The main thing is that you've introduced a short section of triplicated highway. (If in iD editor you zoom right in then select the traffic light or the crossing node, move it to the side a bit, you'll then see the triplicated section of highway, Way: High Street North (154545583), Way: High Street North (742478357) and Way: West Street (139387027) in the same position atop each other.)

The crossing node is tagged as uncontrolled;traffic_signals, what is it uncontrolled or controlled by traffic_signals?

Note that there are several relations involved at this crossroads making for difficult amendments. The best amendment would be to remove the central traffic light note and map all the individual lights and relations. This could leave a central node tagged only as a crossing point. In any case the replicated section should be removed.

The simplest but rough solution is to join the crossing and traffic light nodes, thus removing the triplication. remove the crossing tags from the node which actually are not needed as you have the footway tagged as a crossing.

What do you think?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The school name, along with other school details, is held on the outline of the school premises as per OSM practice. It's therefore not needed on the building. If the building has an independent formal name it can be on the building.

Regards Bernard.

Building reinstated minus B&B tags

Hi, The tracks Way: 55805214, Way: 1150481901 and Way: 1150414262 make a very long ford, probably mistakenly. There is no need to make such large changesets it only makes checking your own work almost impossible. Hence continued mistakes.

I've not made corrections but left the fords for you to see.

Regards Bernard

There are several problems now with buildings across buildings and buildings across highways as stated in the warnings above. Please take heed of such warnings and address them if possible.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the tag building=yes from the site as the site is not a building but an amenity area containing buildings.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A problem, the school area outline is already mapped, and your new area is a duplication. It's OSM practice to correct/amend existing features where possible so you should correct the existing line in this case. Your new line also extends over Barton Road which is incorrect. Thus I've removed your new outline.

Regards Bernard.