Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

May I ask what reasoning makes this a footway rather than a track? The reason for asking is that it is tagged as motor_vehicle=private which indicates a highway status greater than a footway that accommodates vehicle traffic.

I am aware of the Highways Act 1980 definition of a footway but for OSM purposes it is usual to tag a highway as for its greater purpose. Thus a track or road can be a tagged designation=public_footpath while being tagged as a track or road. The fact that the way is a public_footpath does not automatically mean it ought be tagged a footway.

On aerial imagery, the way looks like a track and is actually drawn as a track on Ordnance Survey maps.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, If as you suggest on the Resolved note #2992283 and your edit in this changeset, Saint Athanasius Coptic Orthodox Church (116611783, v7) is now rebuilt, then the tag "razed:building=church" ought be removed.

I can't verify the rebuilding so I'll not amend the tagging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, It looks like there is something wrong with the mapping of the tee area and the three tee nodes. Tee area is Way: 1125234227, three tee nodes are Node: 10267793109, Node: 10270112217 and Node: 10270112218.

Could you have a look and remedy, please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, When you add to a route relation (State Highway 220), it is OSM practice to use the existing sections of highways rather than making new sections to add to the route. Actually, the new highway sections that you mapped were made such that they duplicated the existing highways. Thus routing was completely disrupted.

I've removed your duplicated highways and amended the route relation.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've repositioned the traffic feature.

Duplicates removed.

A few more this morning now repaired, looks good now.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've added lots of nice footpaths which is really good for OSM. Unfortunately, a lot of them are not joined to themselves or the greater highway network. Thus the new paths cannot be used for routing purposes. (Where they cross over themselves or existing highways is actually incorrect mapping.)

I'll try to correct things where I can. But it would be good if you could go over your work so far and make corrections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to point out that the area you changed from landuse=construction to building=residential was in fact the whole construction site. I've amended the building outline to the Bing imagery. I think what was mapped as a wall is now incorporated into the building structure.

Could you check the Starbucks is still in the correct place, please?

Regards Bernard.

The problems were very complicated, highways, buildings, and boundary lines were dragged out of alignment when your new nodes were added. So each problem had to be looked at and corrected individually. So it seemed far easier for me to fix than explain. Thus I've made corrections, I think I've fixed everything. We'll know tomorrow when Geofabrik updates, I'll look again then.

Regards Bernard.

This shows the duplicated sections of highways clearly:- https://tinyurl.com/2p9ep4uc

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Unfortunately, you are introducing quite a few problems when adding these new features. Dragging highways such as to make duplicate sections that disrupt routing. Also please try to avoid joining highway features to area features adjacent to highways.

Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/mvwdchy3 I've not made any corrections so that you can see the problems. Could you please make corrections? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I think you've made a mistake here. This bar is already mapped on Charing Cross Road. Thus I've removed this POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Thanks for the info, would you like to correct the situation, please? Or should I do it, if so is the bridge north or south of the ford and is the track through the ford only or over the bridge as well?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There is a problem with a highway crossing the stream, Way: East Water (29093946). Here there is a highway track crossing the stream at a ford and there has been a bridge (which is also a form of highway), mapped as on top of the track. Is it a ford, a bridge or both.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've placed part of footpath Way: 1123690980 on top of an existing track making a duplicated section of highway. This could disrupt routing so I've removed your duplicate section and amended the track.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated ford Node: 10272890485 is removed.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Are there actually paths by the sides of these roads?

Regards Bernard.

Hello There, I've noticed on some of your changesets that there are several warnings about crossing highways and other problems (as seen above). The highway problems are a particular nuisance as they can disrupt routing.

I wonder if you've noticed these warnings and have remedied those that need correcting? If you have I apologise for mentioning it.

There is a problem with a highway crossing the stream, Way: East Water (29093946). Here there is a highway track crossing the stream at a ford and there has been a bridge (which is also a form of highway), mapped as on top of the track. Is it a ford, a bridge or both.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, One more duplication. I've removed a diplicated section of Way: 33902203

Regards Bernard.