BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 120253566 | over 3 years ago | Way: 1055348553, Way: 1055348552 and Way: 1055348551 being duplicated highways are removed. |
| 120250662 | over 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 120300036 | over 3 years ago | The same situation is again with Way: 1055663875, I've removed it. Please don't draw highways over highways, it seriously disrupts routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 120300036 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Way: 1055663879 is a duplicated highway drawn atop of an existing highway. The tagging you've given to it does not relate to the KartaView imagery. Thus I've removed it. Regards Bernard. |
| 120300439 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've removed Way: 1055667604 for the same reasons as given above.
|
| 120300439 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Your new way, Way: 1055667606, is a duplication of an existing highway. It was drawn atop of Way: 1046412046, it ignores some highways it passes over and also passes over areas shown on imagery to be buildings. The tagging seems strange as well. I've removed the duplicated section. Please don't draw over existing ways to make amendments. Regards Bernard. |
| 120301167 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Your new way, Way: 1055676357, is a duplication of an existing highway. It was drawn atop of Way: اسٹیڈیم روڈ (334207576), it ignores some highways it passes over and also passes over areas shown on imagery to be buildings. The tagging seems strange as well. I've removed the duplicated section. Please don't draw over existing ways to make amendments. Regards Bernard. |
| 120285833 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've tweaked the address to suit OSM practice and removed the duplicated web addresses. A web address should only be placed in the tag website=??? anything else is ignored as an invalid tag. Regards Bernard. |
| 120248452 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Yes the gate will indicate that there is not a through route. |
| 120248645 | over 3 years ago | Hi, the tags would then be access=agricultural, barrier=gate. I've amended it. Regards Bernard. |
| 120248547 | over 3 years ago | Hi, The tag is access=agricultural. I've amended it. Regards Bernard. |
| 120248452 | over 3 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Yes, this is a public footpath, FP 006. This section of the public footpath is on an agricultural access way, highway=track. A public footpath can be on a track, it's not unusual, indeed the south end of this public footpath is on a service highway. I've reinstated the track tag and added prowrefs. Regards Bernard. |
| 120129614 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I've removed the duplicate highway, path on top of track to the south. Doesn't that path cross over the track to exit onto Somerford Keynes Road directly? Regards Bernard. |
| 120170465 | over 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Regards Bernard. |
| 119827724 | over 3 years ago | No response so removed. |
| 119991839 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. No need for the extra park POI, the name is on the park outline. I've made a few tweaks and squared up things. Regards Bernard. |
| 119937256 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Sorry to say that you have drawn many duplicated highways here which I've removed. Please be advised that if a highway needs to be amended/corrected then correction should be done to the existing highway. It is not correct to draw a new highway on top of another nor to delete a highway and draw a new one. The reasoning is to keep all history associated with a highway. Duplication of highways also seriously disrupts routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 119952549 | almost 4 years ago | Hello Mantas, I can see on the Bing imagery shadows of two barriers to the west end of Old Coal Yard. One looks like a swing barrier the other looks like a full gate, I've added them to OSM, Node: -101856 and Node: 94930077. I've tagged the first one access=no
Regards Bernard. |
| 119952549 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've tried to restore the features you've deleted/amended, This is because you inadvertently removed part of a cycleway. Also joined a bridge layer=1 to a railway line layer=-2. The removed road is still an on-the-ground feature and if needed should be properly amended/corrected not merely deleted. If you know the road is inaccessible to vehicles then please tag it as such. Also properly add any barriers as nodes. The length od road is not a barrier.
|
| 119924716 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Very god first go at mapping to OSM. There's a lot to learn and some points are not easy to see/grasp. Unfortunately your new cycleway Way: 1053151247 is already mapped as a cycleway=opposite direction on the highway=unclassified, Way: Lower Marsh (626245392). So the cycleway and road are mapped as one object/feature. Thus the new cycleway is a duplication which I've removed. Regards Bernard. |