Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A rule of OSM is that features added to the database must be verifiable osm.wiki/Verifiability Thus if I can't gain knowledge of the sport feature on a visit here then the feature shouldn't be mapped to OSM. So should it be mapped?

REgards Bernard.

Hi,
Your changeset comment doesn't seem correct. I've unjoined the path from the boundary line. The footpath is a PRoW, I've tagged it as such and removed the permissive tag. There were FP signs at both ends.

Regards Benard.

Hi, This is a driveway so there must be access to it. I've removed the no access tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently dragged a fence node from its correct position. I've replaced it to the original position.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The duplicated sections do confuse routing so I'd agree with combining these highways onto the single original path track lines. I've done this and added tags to show the foot/cycle use and the incline and surface tags.

I hope it's all OK, please check.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

A couple of things to note. The Maxar imagery, selected from the right side background settings of the iD editor has a slightly later depiction and might be better.

If the roads are now open to the public then the tag construction=residential should be removed as well as your amending of the highway tag.

You might like to amend/redraw the outlines of the construction and residential areas to reflect current use.

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the highways you amended here are in part duplicating, (on top of) each other. Path, Way: 216882406 and cycleway Way: 769459075 zig-zag over each other and are in part joined. The cycleway Way: 769459075 then continues zig-zaging over and joining to track Way: 170419116.

Could you have a look at this please, need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated road and footpath.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Is the building really named Building?

Hi, I just want to point out that the feature natural=wood should be drawn as an area, not merely a node/point. This is explained here:- natural=wood

Could you please amend the wood nodes that you've added so that they render properly? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Is there really a tunnel under the bridge Way: 1049686874, seems a bit strange to have booth?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are quite a few problems with your mapping.

Buildings, a few of these are duplicated in that you've drawn an outline around the whole block (tagged as building=house ) then drawn outlines for the individual houses. It's usually only the block or the individual units that are drawn. Only in special circumstances are both drawn. It's also nice to square up buildings, easily done with the iD editor.

Highway lines are the highway center lines. A building (or other feature), would not extend and join onto a highway centerline.

Gardens to houses are not usually formally named, and I doubt would be named 'Garden'. A lot of gardens are open to the public but I doubt these gardens are. It would be appropriate to add the tag access=private.

An addr:housenumber tag should hold the house number only and not include any name as well.

I know it would be very difficult and disheartening for you to go back over what you've mapped. So I've taken gone over all your changesets and made amendments to suit OSM practice. Please have a look, any questions just comment here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Sorry but I only just noticed that this is your first edit to OSM. Please take my comment above as advice.

It's good when you start editing to read up on OSM practices and look at how similar features are mapped. Please seek help if you're not sure.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed your motorway tagging from Way: 199391661. deleted your motorway Way: 1049281894 which was placed on top of an existing highway. These are obviously not motorways, please refrain from adding them.

I also moved the farmland area Way: 1049281895 off of the highway center line, the farmland is not on the highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No problems with your first edit.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You placed part of a footpath (1047680810) on top the track (Way: 1047680808) making for duplication of highways on the same line. This would disrupt routing.

I've removed the track and updated the section of footpath to a track as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder, is the residential area still named Arla Foods? If not the name ought to be removed or tagged disused:name=Arla Foods.

Regards Bernard.

Sorry, lastly please try not to upload duplicated sections of the highway, I've just removed four.

Regards Bernard.

Correction areas, including residential areas, ought not be joined to highways for the above reasons.

Hi, Please be aware that grass areas wouldn't extend to the centerline of unclassified highways, therefore grass should not be joined to road lines. It also makes for difficulties in later amendments.

Regards Bernard