Hi, are you sure the steps go all the way past the hospital? Also you've placed the steps on top of the existing highway (motorable road), the highway or part of it should be removed. I can help if you wish.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You placed the long cart path on top of existing highways making duplicated highways. This is not only wrong mapping (not ground truth), but it also disrupts routing. It's OSM practice that if a way needs correcting/amending the correction is done to the existing way, thus all history is maintained.

I've removed the duplicate highways and amended the existing highways to show your new tagging.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The ways across the field are the definitive line of a public footpath and a public bridleway. Even if the landowner refuses to accept this and/or obstructs the highways they are still highways. Please see here for public rights of way in Norfolk as proof of existence:- http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/highways/

Thus I've reinstated the highways.
Regards Bernard.

Shard Drive (if it exists wouldn't have an address. It might have a tag postal_code=??? but not an addr:postcode=???

I notice also that the road doubles back on itself. Going from the Crescent into the field then back again.

Hi, I am wondering, is Shard Drive a new residential highway? I can find no reference to it on the Caulderdale Council website nor any imagery. Can you show its existence please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The house numbers are not the house names, fiction removed again. Please desist in adding incorrect data to OSM.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the duplicate edges are reported on OSM Inspector Routing layer:- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.38640&lat=53.04646&zoom=14
Two are still there, they will disappear after today.

My thinking is that Jessop Lodge is a place/locality name but some folk disagree with this. It's actually the whole building block that has the name Jessop Lodge and the numbers are of the flats/apartments of the block.

Hi, Royal Mail postcode finder and derbyshire.gov.uk, give the addresses as:-
(Numbers 1 to 8) Jessop Lodge
Jessop Street
Codnor
Ripley
DE5 9SW

So it seems that Jessop Lodge does not exist as a street, rather the four buildings comprising Jessop Lodge are situated on Jessop Street.

Your small piece of highway was visible and was joined to and on the same line as the existing highway, making for duplication.

I don't know if there is a correct answer but it shouldn't be duplication of a highway. I would think a change to the building addresses of the small residential area would be better.

Regards Bernard.

I've removed the highway section you placed on top of an existing highway as it's duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Can you say why you placed The Walkway, a service highway, on top of Grosvenor Road making a duplicate highway section?

You've done similar duplications recently. I've now removed several sections of highway atop of highway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted this changeset because it deleted the fountain.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please respond to the comments on your first changeset changeset/117989468

There are problems with your mapping that you're likely not aware of, so could you please pause editing till the situation is resolved.

In case you don't see this comment I've asked the OSM Data working group to contact you regarding the situation.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've placed the 11km path Way: 1035355669 entirely on top of existing highways. This is duplication and it disrupts routing. Thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've drawn the road over buildings and another highway, it's doubtful if this is a boardwalk. Thus I've removed SV ROAD.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicate section of Way: 195/4/10 (1036027892) and connected it to the A4260 rather than the boundary line that you joined it onto. I also amended the path descriptions and names, those numbers are the County Code not a name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated highway.

Regards Bernard.

Footpath removed as it was mapped on top of the existing highways and on the canal.

Hi, You are placing highway footpath on top of existing highways making duplication that disrupts routing. I've removed this duplication but I think there are more.

Please don't make a highway on top of another highway. If a way needs correcting please make the correction to the existing way as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
My edit of this way was to remove a duplicated section of the path, I also removed a duplicated highway=construction section of highway to the north.

The fee tag was added by the original mapper lamoukate in Changeset: 105233209.

I would agree with removing the fee tag, it doesn't look correct.

Regards Bernard.