BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 117447929 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, With regard to the highway you've removed. It looks like there is a very short stub of Lovatt Avenue joining to the bollards from the A34, where there looks to be pedestrian and cycle access through the bollards. Effectively allowing pedestrian and cycle access from Lovatt Avenue through the bollards onto the stub of Lovatt Avenue to the A34. I see you have also removed the service road into the pub car park. Being or not being a public right of way has no bearing on OSM mapping. Anything that anyone can verify is a feature that can be added to OSM, (if you can see it in any way, you can map it). Therefore could you please reinstate the genuine features you removed? Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 117445047 | almost 4 years ago | Duplicated building removed. |
| 117444424 | almost 4 years ago | Duplicated features removed. |
| 117444900 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Please don't place highways on top of existing highways. If a way needs correcting please do it to the existing way, thus keeping history intact. I've removed your two duplicate highways. Regards Bernard. |
| 117426550 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Your new road was placed on top of an existing highway. Thus making duplication that could disrupt routing. You also tagged the no-through road as oneway. How would vehicles get out? Please note if a feature needs amending/correcting it's OSM practice to make corrections on the existing mapped feature. I've deleted your duplicate way, keeping relevant new tags. Regards Bernard. |
| 117437669 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed your new POI because Awdry House building is mapped and you tagged the POI as a park which it clearly isn't. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 69803247 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Just wanted to let you know that area Way: Steel House Moor (687349472) is unfinished. Regards Bernard. |
| 117351150 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, I assume that building Way: 1030900900 was supposed to be No. 3 rather than having two No. 4s together. I've amended it.
Regards Bernard. |
| 117366298 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, It seems strange to have two properties addressed as No. 2 Tyrell Gardens. Could you check please? Regards Bernard. |
| 117198630 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, as bunkers aren't a natural feature the tag should be surface=sand |
| 117178268 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You placed the service road on top of an existing highway making for duplication. I've removed the new way and amended the existing way as per OSM practice. All good now. Regards Bernard. |
| 117255594 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, I've moved the pedestrian area off of the vehicular highway. Regards Bernard. |
| 117214386 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The public bridleway does not extend as you depicted it. There is no highway on that line either as it crossed several houses. Thus I've reverted the changes. If you need help mapping to OSM please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 117150457 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, You've placed Way: Main Gujrat Universty Road (1029252109) on top of an existing highway. Thus making a duplication of a highway and disrupting routing. It is OSM practice to amend or correct existing features not just map over or on top of existing features. I would suggest the Way: Main Gujrat Universty Road (1029252109) be deleted (as it's duplication), and any amendment or correction be made to the existing highway. Regards Bernard. PS You've spelled university wrongly! |
| 117111819 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, You amended the university boundary line, Thus making a duplicated trunk road. I've reverted your change. Regards Bernard, |
| 117130203 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I don't quite know what you wanted to achieve, but what I can see is that the result is 60 warnings of crossing ways. Thus duplication and disruption of routing along existing ways. Your new way "dusty walk" looks like a fictional highway=unclassified. Thus I've reverted the changeset. OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are compiled so all data must be genuine, verifiable on the ground features. OSM isn't for personal routes. If you can say what it is you're trying to do maybe help can be given. Regards Bernard. |
| 117077629 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Just wanted to let you know you've an untagged line Way: 1028632454. Probably a stream. Further it doesn't join the next section of stream to the west, and it crosses three highways with no ford, culvert or bridge. Regards Bernard. |
| 117075264 | almost 4 years ago | Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your new primary highway seems to be fiction and as drawn corrupts existing features. Thus I've reverted the changes. If you can explain what you're trying to do maybe I can help? Regards Bernard. |
| 117014795 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, your changes dragged several highways out of line. So I've reverted the whole changeset and then reinstated your new POI. Regards Bernard. |
| 116939193 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please be careful to check your editing for mistakes before uploading. This will be a lot easier if you limit the number of feature edits in each changeset. Ten is good. There are 45 features edited in this changeset, 3 contained mistakes. It's easier to find these 3 editing mistakes in a smaller changeset. The 3 mistakes were nodes on 3 features dragged out of alignment. I've restored the nodes to their original positions. Regards Bernard. |