Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've drawn 11 lines here without tagging them. Without descriptive tags they are really meaningless.

It's very difficult here to see if the shapes are actually buildings.

Could you please have a look at making some amendments?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The name "Offa's Dyke Path" is the name of the hiking route as a whole, not the name of individual sections of the route. The name "Offa's Dyke Path" is held in the route relation tagging, please see relation/9649

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've been removing duplicated sections of footpath highway that you've recently added. It looks like you are now re-adding some of those duplications back onto OSM.

Please do not place a footpath on top of any existing highway. It is OSM practice to make any corrections or amendments to existing ways.

Please also be aware that only formal verifiable names should be placed in the name= tag. I think you may be adding place or locality names to these paths which is incorrect.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are compiled. So it's not really the place to upload personal details. Thus I have removed the fiction you uploaded.

If you need help adding genuine features please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow inadvertently dragged two footpaths out of line in London UK. I've reverted this changeset so no harm is done, I kept your change to the gallery.

Please be careful when uploading and keep to small areas, this one spanned the Atlantic Ocean.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. Thus adding fiction to the data could cause serious disruption. I've reverted your fictional additions so no harm is done.

If you need help adding to OSM please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've got different levels joined together which is obviously wrong.

Are the apartments flats above the shops for ordinary domestic letting or
tourism apartments for holiday let? There is a difference to the use and tagging is different. Also, an apartment is not a room so the room tag ought be removed.

Regards Bernard.

The tag name=Footpath I've removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's OSM practice to make amendments or corrections to the originally mapped object where possible. Thus the object's full history is maintained. So I've reverted the building and then added your new info and amended the shape.

I removed name=Bungalow as you have the name as Dorcasia.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently dragged a building and highway out of shape, I've amended them back to the original shapes. Also tweaked the house shape.

Please take time to check your edits before uploading.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Was this addition a test edit or just fiction? Do you need any help? I've removed the POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed Way: 934042105 as it was placed on top of an existing highway. I've already explained the problems this causes.

Regards Bernard.

No response and you've made a further similar duplication so I've removed Way: 933602881

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are many problems with cycleway Way: 934042104 It is mostly placed on top of existing highways making duplication of highways and thus disrupting routing. If a way needs correcting or amending you should do this to the existing way.

The problem of duplicated highways was pointed out to you on Changeset: 103361875 which you have not addressed. So to avoid the problems this duplication causes I've reverted the changes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You have placed Way: 933602881 on top of Way: Rainham Road North (4877181) making for duplication of highways. This is obviously incorrect and disrupts routing, the Way: 933602881 should be amended or removed.

Regards Bernard.

OK, that's a valid reason. The barrier actually means that no traffic including taxis can pass through. So the taxi=no tag should not be applied to the rest of the highway, thus I've removed it.

Could you state what traffic is allowed past or through the barrier? Because as tagged now nothing is allowed through not even pedestrians.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, bridge tags on whole length of path removed, access tag removed (there is access). The path goes under the railway so tagged as tunnel layer=-1

Hi, there is foot access to the path. Therefore it can't be access=no as that means there isn't any access at all.

Hi, Sorry for being late to respond back. I've now tagged it as shared-use foot and cycle.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new building OM Interactive, as mapped within an existing building should be tagged as building:part=industrial because it's a building part within an existing building. As drawn it is not a building independent of any other.

However, when zoomed in the imagery is good enough to separate the building parts. So I've separated and re-drawn the sections of buildings. I also amended the address.

Regards Bernard.