Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your additions to OSM look very strange and make no sense as drawn and tagged. As such they should be amended or deleted as soon as possible. I wonder if you are trying to mark property you have for sale? If so this is not the right place to do this, OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled.

Could you explain what you wish to add to OSM, perhaps I can help. Please respond ASAP.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, my point would be that the tag building=terrace should logically refer to a row of houses. These individual houses, (in a terrace), ought to be tagged building=house. The tag house=terraced could also be added to indicate the house type. I think this method is best/easiest.

Please see here for more info:- building=terrace
and here:- house=terraced

Regards Bernard.

Hi, if this is not now the council offices please amend the tags to
disused:name=Moray Council Access Point and disused:
office=government. Thus other folk will know whats happened.

I've removed duplicated section of path and tweaked paths and steps.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There's no real address and the website address is corrupted so the POI has no value. At least a correct website would be good.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The lodge name is tagged so will display the name when the map tiles are re-rendered. The other block has no name. I had assumed that the tag addr:housename=1-20 Farthing Fields (being neither a name or proper address), was supposed to be addr:housenumber=1-20
addr:street=Farthing Fields. Thus with these tags 1-20 will be displayed. Does the block have a proper name?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I changed the name to description as it's not a name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've made amendment to the address to conform to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Correct into two buildings and square up barns

I've repositioned several sections of the stream, reversed the direction of two sections, and joined up correctly.

I moved this house off of the stream and squared it up.
Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you zoom in (with te iD editor) you will be able to draw houses much more accurately. There is also a facility to square up building outlines. I've corrected this one.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Way: Tum Hill Circular (922847687) was placed on top of existing highways.

Way: Tum Hill Circular Walk (922847370) was placed partly on top of a river and part over existing highways.

Please be aware that Public Footpath FP183 is not the name. It's the council reference

Hi I've removed two ways that duplicated the single existing way.

Hi, I've removed the path as it duplicates an existing one. If a way needs correcting or amending please do the correction to the existing way so as to keep the ways data history.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag for this situation would be disused:name=Fairlawn Nursery, I've made the change. Is the school still in operation? Do you know the new name? If it's not now used the tags should be amended to disused:amenity=school and disused:building=school on the school building.

Regards Bernard.

The above relates to features with only lane tags as well.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Adding objects to OSM with only a name tag is actually meaningless to the OSM database. These objects are not recognised and will not be rendered on a map.

Please take a little time to read and understand how to map, this is easily done via the help button above right.

If you are not able to correct the mistakes in all your changesets I'll try to make corrections later.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, I've removed the fictional motorway you added to OpenStreetMap. I'm sure you didn't intend to deliberately corrupt the OSM database. Could you therefore please try not to upload unverifiable features. Thanks!

Regards Bernard.