Hi, I moved the building outline to coincide with it's footprint rather than the imagery roof position which is offset.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, All looks good now.

Just a couple of pointers to maybe help in the future. If you get a similar problem again cancel your upload and try to get the interfering changes reverted before making any upload, else you end up with conflicts (possibly compounded conflicts). In the mean time JOSM allows for you to save your changeset layer and upload it after you've got problems sorted out.

Lastly for entrances it's better to tag entrance=yes (main, service, whatever) and ref=B, You then get a proper icon instead of a dot.

Best Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Will you be removing the duplicated building outline contained in the multipolygon relation?

This is why it's not a good idea to make large change-sets.

I just tried to revert the changeset but it results up conflicts and warnings. I would think that you have made some changes from when I made that last changeset.

Do you want me to try and resolve the conflicts?

Regards Bernard.

Hi Chris, I've divided the building, amended the addresses and put a note to explain the reason of the building division. Please see if you agree.

Regards Bernard.

Yes I looked up the postcodes.

It's difficult to see where the division is so I've guessed at a split and uploaded it. What do you think? If it's OK I'll amend the address.
Bernard.

Your query regarding the OSM search, you have to search for what is in the database. SE96BT is not in the database and is an incorrect postcode. Postcodes must have a space between the outward and inward sections of the code, SE9 6BT is in the database and returns Campbell Court.
Bernard.

Hello Chris, There's two ways to do that. One is to map/mark all the entrances and tag each entrance with the correct address and all apartment numbers. The other perhaps easier way is to section up the building on the division the the post code takes and address each section of building.

Are you local, would you be able to advise where the division should be or where all entrances are. Plus apartment numbers for each area/entrance.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed the new building, there's no building at that position. Did you mean to add a building on the site just to the north of Embry Road?

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You seem to have added footpaths Way: 802004779 and Way: 802698664 on top of an existing highway Way: 10425498.
The existing way you changed the status from unclassified to path adding an unnecessary tag oneway=no. The two footpaths are tagged differently.

The existing highway is a service road which also serves as a public footpath. Could you please rectify these problems?
If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately your edit to OSM resulted in the deletion of a long bridleway as well as several minor amendments to areas and roads. Your addition was tagged as manmade=cutline which from imagery seems fictional. I think you might have been meaning to add a track to the map.

In order to reinstate the bridleway and other alterations to existing features I have reverted the changeset.

If you need help correctly adding a track or anything else to the map please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the roads are open for public use then the construction= tags should be removed.

The Maxar imagery, which you can use in the iD editor is much more up to date. You can see there that some roads you've amended are drawn going through houses, (Spriggs Street, Davey Road).

Regards Bernard.

Hello Kyran, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In case you were not aware the is guidance on golf course tagging here :-https://tinyurl.com/yamksxc4

There is a problem with how you've mapped the water features, please see here :-https://tinyurl.com/y7cb88yh
It looks like you tried to draw areas in a linear fashion. This results in the problem of self intersection.

If the water hazard is an area (pond, lake) it should be mapped as a polygon and tagged natural=pond or lake. Tag as golf=water_hazard or golf=lateral_water_hazard, I think now both tags mean the same thing, please see :-https://tinyurl.com/ydcjhxhz

If the water is a narrow stream, ditch or drain it's mapped as a single line, (linear feature) and tagged to suit, waterway=stream or ditch. Please have regard to the direction of water flow. Even though a linear feature this can be tagged golf=water_hazard or golf=lateral_water_hazard

The wiki also advises tagging grass as surface=grass rather than landuse=grass.

If you need help amending the self intersections please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

I've moved the bins off of the highway center line so folk don't fall over them.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I want to let you know that in deleting the footpath around Peto's Marsh you have broken the linear route relation of the Via Beata long distance path. You have also deleted other existing features. Please be aware that you ought to strive to maintain all existing features on OSM when you make amendments. If the Via Beata way has changed have you tried to ascertain it's new route? If you need help amending the route relation please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Moved area off of the road center line, it doesn't extend to there.

All Coop data placed on building rather than duplicating it with a POI

Removed the access=no from footpath.
Un-joined highway nodes from un-associated area outlines.
Squared up buildings.

OK I've removed your duplicated section of footpath.

Hi, I extended the path to join Springs Road, it looks logical but if I'm wrong please amend or let me know the situation.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the section of your new path that was placed on top of the old railway line. I updated that section of railway line with your footpath data.

Regards Bernard.