Hi, If the railway crossing is private why delete it? It ought to have been properly tagged do folk would know it's private. They're not going to look up your changeset comment to find out.
Regards Bernard,

Hi, I've un-joined the Upper Thames Sailing Club area from the center of the railway line.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, there is private vehicle access down this track so motor_vehicle=no is incorrect. I've changed it to motor_vehicle=private.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I removed access=no tag from the footpath, there is public access to the footpath. Add bridge over the stream.

Changed layer=-2 to layer=1 on bridge part. Remove bridge=yes from bridge structure, (only bridge as a highway has bridge=yes).

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wonder how you are aware that Way: 296927558 is a permissive route? Secondly to what mode of traffic is it permissive?

I've corrected the status of the track from Dobbs Lane as per the NCC map.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I made a few amendments to your mapping

Remove layer tag (not neede here), reinstate playground tag (it is a childs playground not a park), remove tree node from admin boundary line, remove recreation ground outline (it's already mapped).

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you forgot to cut a section of path out where the bridge is. Thus both footway and bridge crossed the stream. (I think you did this on one of the other bridges.)
I've not amended this path, just added a node and pulled path to the side so you can see it. Would you like to amend the path, if not I'll do it later.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Streams OK, try not to join the stream to the bridge, (one passes over the other without joining. For info fords do join path to stream.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Yes intersection is OK.

Hi I removed duplicated sections of path and bridge.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know. It looks like you and @SK53 were mapping this camp site at the same time resulting in a few duplications.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know. It looks like you and @trigpoint were mapping this camp site at the same time resulting in a few duplications.
Regards Bernard.

Nice work Phil, thanks for making the few changes.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, The definitive line of Way: 329931833 at the north east may well go through a house swimming pool and gardens but that is not necessarily ground truth. By all means mark the definitive path line but mark also the obstructions so folk know they can't walk there, or tag as highway=no on that section. It would also be great if any alternative way is used to overcome the obstructions.

I've amended several path lines, water lines, woods lines and joined crossing highways.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Great to see more paths added to the map. You tag this track as permissive but that does not inform the public as to what access is permitted, perhaps you might add foot=permissive. It might be more accurate to tag access=agriculture, foot=permissive.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
As you say this is on the OS map, it's a footpath therefore cycles are not allowed as a right. Thus bicycle=yes is incorrect. Permissive cycling would have to be by express permission of the landowner.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, The features tagged operator=Bt, the operator refers to it's self as BT (two capital letters), cold you please rectify these instances?

You refer to several utility poles as material=wood:ruian:type:ruian:type, should these be just material=wood? If so could you amend instances please.
Regards Bernard.

Sorry but your tagging of the fire hydrant Node: Fire Hydrant (7455836707) is incorrect.
I'm certain the hydrant does not have a formal name so that's fiction and should be removed.
The tag Fire_hydrant:type=underground=Sluice valve is not recognised by OSM (capital letters should not be used in this tag). Tags describing this feature more precisely are emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=underground
water=sluice_valve

Could you please amend the hydrants you've addded?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, does the permissive path Way: 796573935 to the west of the canal really exist?

I've tidied the paths and canal up so the paths don't cross onto the water.