OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
81647149 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
In the absence of any oneway tag it is inferred there is no oneway restriction.
Regards Bernard.

81649367 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
That block is of 6 houses unfortunately your edit placed a building inside the original building.
I've terraced the original building adding your data to the end house which I think is the correct one. Then removing the duplicate building.

I hope that's OK, Regards Bernard.

81624931 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can you walk down the path onto Shelford Road? If so it should join with Shelford Road, need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

81420732 almost 6 years ago

Hi desert2020,
I must first say that I don't recall the extensive wetland or scrub areas, they certainly don't show on any imagery.

I have to point out some problems that I see on many of your changesets. There are lots of names that do not seem to be formal names, rather they look like descriptions of what you are doing.

Also there are many self intersections, some I have corrected. I'll not correct more of them as I see from the comments above that the source material might not be valid.

If you do not have explicit permission (preferably in writing) that shows you can copy from the paper maps (directly or indirectly) then the changes ought be reverted.

From your last comment are you asking for someone to delete the changesets you added? If so it's really a jof for the OSM Data Working Group as there are 157 edits.

Regards Bernard.

81578923 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The recognised tagging the condemned building would be disused:amenity=townhall and remove the townhall:type=village tag. The name isn't (condemned) so that tag should also be removed.

Regards Bernard.

81554063 almost 6 years ago

I joined the gate to the fence barrier.

79510263 almost 6 years ago

Hi, I've removed all the duplicated section of highway. I created a hiking route relation from all the sections of highway indicated from the duplications. You can see it here :- https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=10753565

I think it's all OK, please make any adjustments you think necessary. Perhaps this will help you map the other routes. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

81545197 almost 6 years ago

Hi, I've joined up several of your footpaths and removed some isolated section that are really duplications.
Regards Bernard.

81538607 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
For the roads that are now open for public use the construction=residential tag should be removed.

Please note that if an existing way needs amending then it's best to amend/adjust/correct the existing way. Then the ways history is kept, removing and redrawing losses the previous history.

The Esri and Maxar imagery is more up to date than the Bing imagery, (that you've used), so the roads can be better aligned.

Regards Bernard.

81492061 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Sorry about that and thanks for pointing it out. It actually appears on OSMIGeometry this morning, quite extensive, don't know how I missed seeing it.
Entire changeset has now been reverted now.

81406434 almost 6 years ago

Hi, I've removed the untagged ways that duplicated existing path lines, Way: 775956440, Way: 775956590, Way: 775956439. Amended and tagged part of the last one.
Regards Bernard.

81376757 almost 6 years ago

Hi, No need for negative tag oneway=no, in normal cases in the absence of any oneway tag it is implied that there in no oneway restriction. Thus to add oneway=no to roads just bloats the database.

I've been changing your building=yes tag to building=residential where appropriate.

Regards Bernard.

80025836 almost 6 years ago

Lots more duplicated and untagged ways had to be removed from this changeset. Please try to be more careful.
Regards Bernard.

80090956 almost 6 years ago

Lots more duplicated and untagged ways had to be removed from this changeset. Please try to be more careful.
Regards Bernard.

81293330 almost 6 years ago

I then found more white space in that fixme, you double spaced between fullstops and capital letters.

81293330 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the width=0 tag from Way: 133033448 as it does not allow use of the track.
I removed the name from Sparse trees and nettle border (775132613, v1), I very much doubt if that's is a formal verifiable name.
I've removed the width=0 tag from Way: 775132612 as it does not allow use of the path, if the width can't be determined please don't put 0 width as that's incorrect and says there is no path, (routers would not select that way as usable because of the restriction).
Removed a white space from the end of your fixme tag as it made the fixme invalid. Usually any extra so space (so called white space) makes a tag invalid.
Otherwise pretty good start, don't be put off by a few mistakes as there's a lot to learn about OSM mapping. Please just ask if you need help.

Regards Bernard.

81274694 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed duplicated building lines and the description and name tags. This to conform to OSM practice.
Regards Bernard.

81271033 almost 6 years ago

Hi, I,remove the duplicated name, it's on the building, no need to state it twice.
Regards Bernard.

81237921 almost 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You added number 18 to the whole terrace block which can't be right as there are about 15 houses there. So I've removed the number. If you can accurately pinpoint the position you could place a POI there with the single house data. Or better still map all the houses in the terrace. Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

81227280 almost 6 years ago

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to point out a possible spelling typo, you typed "Rose Rafm House", should that be Rose Farm House.
Regards Bernard.