BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 81647149 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 81649367 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I hope that's OK, Regards Bernard. |
| 81624931 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 81420732 | almost 6 years ago | Hi desert2020,
Also there are many self intersections, some I have corrected. I'll not correct more of them as I see from the comments above that the source material might not be valid. If you do not have explicit permission (preferably in writing) that shows you can copy from the paper maps (directly or indirectly) then the changes ought be reverted. From your last comment are you asking for someone to delete the changesets you added? If so it's really a jof for the OSM Data Working Group as there are 157 edits. Regards Bernard. |
| 81578923 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Regards Bernard. |
| 81554063 | almost 6 years ago | I joined the gate to the fence barrier. |
| 79510263 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, I've removed all the duplicated section of highway. I created a hiking route relation from all the sections of highway indicated from the duplications. You can see it here :- https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=10753565 I think it's all OK, please make any adjustments you think necessary. Perhaps this will help you map the other routes. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 81545197 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, I've joined up several of your footpaths and removed some isolated section that are really duplications.
|
| 81538607 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please note that if an existing way needs amending then it's best to amend/adjust/correct the existing way. Then the ways history is kept, removing and redrawing losses the previous history. The Esri and Maxar imagery is more up to date than the Bing imagery, (that you've used), so the roads can be better aligned. Regards Bernard. |
| 81492061 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Sorry about that and thanks for pointing it out. It actually appears on OSMIGeometry this morning, quite extensive, don't know how I missed seeing it.
|
| 81406434 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, I've removed the untagged ways that duplicated existing path lines, Way: 775956440, Way: 775956590, Way: 775956439. Amended and tagged part of the last one.
|
| 81376757 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, No need for negative tag oneway=no, in normal cases in the absence of any oneway tag it is implied that there in no oneway restriction. Thus to add oneway=no to roads just bloats the database. I've been changing your building=yes tag to building=residential where appropriate. Regards Bernard. |
| 80025836 | almost 6 years ago | Lots more duplicated and untagged ways had to be removed from this changeset. Please try to be more careful.
|
| 80090956 | almost 6 years ago | Lots more duplicated and untagged ways had to be removed from this changeset. Please try to be more careful.
|
| 81293330 | almost 6 years ago | I then found more white space in that fixme, you double spaced between fullstops and capital letters. |
| 81293330 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Regards Bernard. |
| 81274694 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 81271033 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, I,remove the duplicated name, it's on the building, no need to state it twice.
|
| 81237921 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 81227280 | almost 6 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|