OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
70836754 over 6 years ago

Hi, You've drawn Way: 693925786 over a footway Way: 44332298 without joining to it, is there a bridge or tunnel here? If not the two ways should be joined.

73843259 over 6 years ago

Hi, you keep changing or adding residential areas that are already within a residential area. This is just unnecessary duplication.

Way: 221853910 is yet another one I've removed.

73885073 over 6 years ago

No response, OK I've un-joined the areas from the highway center line. I'm pretty sure I'm correct in doing this as it would be difficult to drive the service road with the woods in the way.

If you can't or are un-inclined to make repairs to your own mapping you just have say and someone will repair it for you.

Regards,

74053988 over 6 years ago

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just one point names are usually rendered on most projects that use OSM data, so if a place in named twice in the database it appears twice on the map.
Therefore it is OSM practice to only name an object or feature once. In the case of schools the name and most other details go on the amenity feature, (the grounds outline).

For this reason I've removed the name from the building.

Regards Bernard.

73719801 over 6 years ago

Hi Richard, No I don't know better I was just wondering about the route the footway takes. What I do know is that the highway is duplicated where the footpath is on top of the service road.
Regards Bernard

73719801 over 6 years ago

Hello Richard,
Way: 718140843 at the end near the A496. There is a section that duplicates part of Way: 289092974

I wonder if the path should exit the field through the pedestrian gate into the area where the building is. Rather than going through what looks like a wall with no gap/gate. The the path might not join the service road. ( It may be the imagery I'm looking at is out of date though).

Any way the duplication ought be rectified.

Regards Bernard.

73950053 over 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The Maxar imagery is much more up to date than Bing around here. With it you will see your new residential roads are a long way out. You may well be able to draw in the features you marked as points.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

73914555 over 6 years ago

Hello, your mapping of the highway (Way: Route from M3 Jnc to Park and Ride to Handlebar Cafe (720159408)) is incorrect. It duplicates sections of existing highways thus seriously disrupting routing. These changes should be reverted in order to maintain the integrity and history of the existing features that have been altered.

The correct method to add/show a route over ways that already exist is to make separate all sections of the existing ways that are to be included in the route. Then add the sections of the existing ways into a route relation. This page shows you how it's done :- osm.wiki/Relation:route

Do you need help reverting these changes, I can do so if you wish?

Regards Bernard.

73889174 over 6 years ago

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure the area you added Way: Handlebar Cafe (719944345) is the outline of the cafe building? If, as I suspect by imagery and the roads you've placed it over, it isn't then please remove it. Only correct and verifiable features should be added to OSM.

You also placed a POI for the cafe, is this correctly positioned?

Regards Bernard.

73613963 over 6 years ago

No response so I've moved the POI to where I think it should be, amended address as well.

73885273 over 6 years ago

Hi, I removed the self intersection from the water outline Way: 719922245 and tagged the inner part as islet then created a multipolygon. This is the way to draw such features without having a self intersection, plus the islet is properly tagged.
Regards Bernard.

73885073 over 6 years ago

Hi, Please don't join highways to multiple area ways as here. It's very difficult later to disentangle the highway.

73872882 over 6 years ago

Hi,
Unfortunately you've drawn the service road as joined to and through a building. If you need help amending please just ask.

Regards Bernard

73788530 over 6 years ago

Hi, I've removed the POI putting all info on the building outline. I made minor amendment to the address tagging.
All is OK. There was nothing wrong with your initial mapping, it was not quite to OSM practice that's all.

Regards Bernard.

73862530 over 6 years ago

Hi Ed, Nice work, it'll be a lot better for everyone now.

73481131 over 6 years ago

I don't know, I removed the duplicated section of the cycleway keeping all the tags on the remaining cycleway.

73862530 over 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The camp site is a fairly large area/complex. Is it possible to draw the whole area? If you could send me a map I could draw it in.
Regards Bernard.

73855251 over 6 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I removed the crossing from the end of the footpath, it isn't actually crossing anything.

For the bus stop the tag highway=bus_stop infers bus=yes so no need for bus=yes.

The tag natural=wood is meant for an area rather than a POI, so I've drawn in the wood area.

Your shop POI has problems, the postcode is presented incorrectly (the letters should be in capitals). You've tagged it as a driving school and as a shop, these are two different features and shouldn't be mixed. Actually the place the POI is on looks like a house, not a shop or driving school. Is it perhaps a business or office in a house?

If yo need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

71117660 over 6 years ago

Second thoughts maybe it wasn't your changes. Sorry!

71117660 over 6 years ago

Hi, You've made a bit of a mess of Way: 60761187, please look here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=0.72928&lat=51.34699&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way