OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
73791294 over 6 years ago

The addr:country should be GB as per OSM practice.

73790852 over 6 years ago

The addr:country should be GB as per OSM practice.

73790560 over 6 years ago

No need for a building and a POI node. The building is incorrectly drawn over the carpark.
No need for both building=yes, just amenity=community_centre will do.

73789456 over 6 years ago

Hi, The path name is unlikely to be "Unmarked Footpath".
You've joined the path to the administrative boundary line instead of the bridleway.

73789638 over 6 years ago

The data on your new node is duplication of the data already on the area outline which is to OSM practice.

73789706 over 6 years ago

Hi, the data bus=yes is implied by highway=bus_stop, no need for both. Also no need to add address data to a bus stop. Have a look at other Naptan data items or the wiki.

73790250 over 6 years ago

Hi, It would be taken that there is access to a recreation ground unless there are restrictions. Does the ground really have a house number?

73789147 over 6 years ago

Please see the comment on your first uploaded changeset.

73788530 over 6 years ago

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
No need for a separate node if the building is drawn. All info should go on the building. Thus helping to avoid bloating the database with duplicated data.
Regards Bernard.

13562317 over 6 years ago

Hi,
The tag landuse=residential is not needed as building=yes or more correctly building=house conveys the meaning that the area is residential.

Further all your tags landuse=residential on buildings are duplication as you have tagged the wider area as landuse=residential.

A lot of your uses of the tag addr:street= are incorrect, it is supposed to hold a street name, <val='Park Avenue',<Priority; inDataSet: false, inStandard: false, selected: false>> is not a street name.

You have also mixed Address Interpolation with individual address annotation. The two do not intermix please use one form or the other

I also notice that several building outlines in other changesets are self intersecting.

Could you please correct these anomalies?

Regards Bernard

73235466 over 6 years ago

Hi, with different imagery I see this as well. Duplicate is removed.

73710897 over 6 years ago

Hello,
I have studied this changeset in detail and cannot see anything that pertains to contributions you have made.

I did amend duplicated sections of ferry routes in this changeset by separating them, (thus they no longer shown as duplicated sections).

If you could give a changeset number where I have amended one of your contributions I will certainly look at it and try to explain. I am also aware that I can make mistakes.

We did exchange comments back in August 2018.

Regards Bernard.

73561220 over 6 years ago

Hi,
Are there actually two tunnels each with two highways in them making four highways all told, Pedestrian Tunnel (37851028, v10)
Pedestrian Tunnel (716004729, v1)
716004728, v1
716004727, v1

73331994 over 6 years ago

No response so I've removed the node.

73558427 over 6 years ago

Hi, I removed a lot of the fences from going through buildings. I've never seen a house a fence through the middle of it. Problems would arise when arranging furniture I would think.

73613963 over 6 years ago

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think you have incorrectly placed your office POI, in the church building. Number 1, Maddox House, Maddox Street is at the end by Regent Street.
If you need help please just ask.
regards Bernard.

73367023 over 6 years ago

Going by aerial imagery I also joined two paths to roads in order to connect them to the wider highway network. These warnings were given at your upload. Some warnings are false positives but please try to correct warnings at upload.

Regards Bernard.

73367023 over 6 years ago

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Are you sure Way: 284515611 is accessible to emergency vehicles give that there are bollards mapped at each end. If it really is an emergency vehicle route then emergency=yes tag would be appropriate.
Could you please look at this, Regards Bernard.

73236684 over 6 years ago

Hi. Once again you've made a fix that has dragged a different way out of shape. In amending Ream's Way you dragged the node joining to Liquorice Way out of position. Please can you correct this?

73291354 over 6 years ago

The market is actually a building not a corridor!
I have amended, re-tagged and redrawn the market utilising the original data, your data and the original POI data. All is now presented correctly on the building outline.
I amended the long tunnel to show just the building passageway as a tunnel.
Please don't make alterations incorrectly, it's best to learn the correct way, ask, or just leave things as they are.