BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 73791294 | over 6 years ago | The addr:country should be GB as per OSM practice. |
| 73790852 | over 6 years ago | The addr:country should be GB as per OSM practice. |
| 73790560 | over 6 years ago | No need for a building and a POI node. The building is incorrectly drawn over the carpark.
|
| 73789456 | over 6 years ago | Hi, The path name is unlikely to be "Unmarked Footpath".
|
| 73789638 | over 6 years ago | The data on your new node is duplication of the data already on the area outline which is to OSM practice. |
| 73789706 | over 6 years ago | Hi, the data bus=yes is implied by highway=bus_stop, no need for both. Also no need to add address data to a bus stop. Have a look at other Naptan data items or the wiki. |
| 73790250 | over 6 years ago | Hi, It would be taken that there is access to a recreation ground unless there are restrictions. Does the ground really have a house number? |
| 73789147 | over 6 years ago | Please see the comment on your first uploaded changeset. |
| 73788530 | over 6 years ago | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 13562317 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
Further all your tags landuse=residential on buildings are duplication as you have tagged the wider area as landuse=residential. A lot of your uses of the tag addr:street= are incorrect, it is supposed to hold a street name, <val='Park Avenue',<Priority; inDataSet: false, inStandard: false, selected: false>> is not a street name. You have also mixed Address Interpolation with individual address annotation. The two do not intermix please use one form or the other I also notice that several building outlines in other changesets are self intersecting. Could you please correct these anomalies? Regards Bernard |
| 73235466 | over 6 years ago | Hi, with different imagery I see this as well. Duplicate is removed. |
| 73710897 | over 6 years ago | Hello,
I did amend duplicated sections of ferry routes in this changeset by separating them, (thus they no longer shown as duplicated sections). If you could give a changeset number where I have amended one of your contributions I will certainly look at it and try to explain. I am also aware that I can make mistakes. We did exchange comments back in August 2018. Regards Bernard. |
| 73561220 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
|
| 73331994 | over 6 years ago | No response so I've removed the node. |
| 73558427 | over 6 years ago | Hi, I removed a lot of the fences from going through buildings. I've never seen a house a fence through the middle of it. Problems would arise when arranging furniture I would think. |
| 73613963 | over 6 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think you have incorrectly placed your office POI, in the church building. Number 1, Maddox House, Maddox Street is at the end by Regent Street.
|
| 73367023 | over 6 years ago | Going by aerial imagery I also joined two paths to roads in order to connect them to the wider highway network. These warnings were given at your upload. Some warnings are false positives but please try to correct warnings at upload. Regards Bernard. |
| 73367023 | over 6 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 73236684 | over 6 years ago | Hi. Once again you've made a fix that has dragged a different way out of shape. In amending Ream's Way you dragged the node joining to Liquorice Way out of position. Please can you correct this? |
| 73291354 | over 6 years ago | The market is actually a building not a corridor!
|