Hi, I removed self intersection from Way: 707173365

Hi, I've amended the tagging to suit OSM practice, removed tags that are on or inferred by course area tags, unjoined power lines from ground features.

Regards.

Please see my comment on golf course tagging here :- changeset/72531236

Could you please consider the advice there and amend your contributions to suit.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please change your changeset to reflect the changes you make. Continuously is meaningless.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've removed the entrance and added a gate.

Hi, I very much doubt if the fences go through the building. It would make positioning of furniture difficult within the building.

Hi. Please see leisure=golf_course for current advice on golf course tagging.

The areas of greens, tees and fairways should use surface=grass rather than landuse=grass.

There is no need to use the tags leisure=pitch, sport=golf or leisure=golf_course on features within the golf course these tags are on or implied by tags on the course area outline.

Features on the course ought not be tagged with proper names. Unless they are specifically named and the names are verifiable. Holes, tees and fairways can be described with their number by using the ref= tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That's OK (thanks for trying to amend it), these comments can't be edited. Please learn from it and try to remember to change the comment before uploading.

Regards Bernard.

Way: 704251222, a section of Park Road is still seriously misaligned. It should be removed from Node: 6632688826 and joined to Node: 4112393004. So that it continues from the SE to the NW in an pretty much straight line. You need also to amend/adjust the restrictions on Node: 6632688826.

You also ought to reinstate all the tags you removed from some sections of highways around here, lanes, lit, maxspeed, oneway, ref, surface. These were all descriptions other folk had taken time to add.

Regarding Beechnut Lane. There is still a spelling mistake and an abbreviation that shouldn't be there. I can't understand why you had to remove the maxspeed=30 mph tag?

I'm extremely sorry to say you've inadvertently made a heck of a lot of mistakes.

You've left Park Road, Way: 704251222, still disrupted at the major junction.

If you look above you'll see there were warnings when you uploaded these changes. "warnings:crossing_ways = 4
warnings:outdated_tags:incomplete_tags = 1"
These are meant to alert you to make modifications before uploading.

Hi,

You have mapped/added Cycle Way: 705357069 showing it to cross over two sections of primary highway and a primary link road. The ways are not joined at the crossing point. The ways should be joined or bridged. If joined it would be good to depict the type of crossing.

Bernard.

I removed the cemetery from the center line of highways.

Hickory Ct abbreviation expanded to Hickory Court.

Abbreviation Pecan Ct expanded to Pecan Court

Hi,
You have also abbreviated Beechnut Lane to Beechnut Ln, please don't amend names (or anything else) without determining OSM best practices.

You still have the damage to repair where Beechnut Lane joins the two carriageways of the A639 primary highway. This incorrect amendment will cause havoc to routers.

Bernard.

The car-park name is on the area, no need for duplication on ways. Amended highway crossing point and footways.

All problems in this changeset are now sorted.

Hi,

Regarding Way: 320459377, I'm pretty sure there is no meadow here. With respect I think you are mapping from imagery without any ground survey. Much of this area is developed. Please be sure about what you add to OSM. If not sure don't add.

Way: 706870012, a crossing is duplication, the crossing is a node on Aketon Road.

Way: 706870010, crosses a cycleway without joining to it, doubles back on itself.

Way: 706870008 is drawn over farmland. If this is really residential the the landuse=farmland should be removed/amended.

Way: 706870007 is a crossing that goes only to the centerline of the A639. Better to make the path cross the road and tag the crossing point on the joining/crossing node.

Way: 706870006, does this join the A639 as a service road?

Way: 706870005 another strangely mapped crossing. the path is joined onto areas at one end. Sorry to say this area really is a mess.

Way: 706870004, a crossing path that doesn't join onto anything.

You've also seriously disrupted Way: 306751516, Doubled it back and severed it from the link to the roundabout, this is a primary highway. Thus Sat Nav routing will be useless.

Please stop!

Regards Bernard.

That's OK I see you've removed the numbers. The addr:city is Milton Keynes though.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, it's not a great problem but it wouldn't be routable as it is.

Have a look at it first and if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.