Hi, deleting and redrawing buildings is not the correct way to include building levels. For the Cannon Square building you have broken up the whole building outline, removed the building name and substituted three small sections (unnamed) of the building. Deleting and redrawing also losses the history of the mapping of the building.

Please see here building:levels=* and here building:part=* for information on building parts and levels.

It would be best to revert your changes, thus reinstating OSM history of changes, then, after reading up on OSM best practices, start your amendments again.

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The Plaza building is already mapped as a hotel, please look here osm.org/go/xexSlH0Z0?way=177441346

You can see the original Plaza Hotel (blue text and a bed icon. Left and up a bit is your new building (grey text) your building is also on top of another building.

If you could just remove/delete your addition everything will be OK. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've redrawn some of your areas, retagged others to suit OSM practices.

Regards Bernard.

Hello ans Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your recent additions to the OSM database do not conform to OSM best practice. In fact they look like they are a fiction. If they are fiction then please remove them. If not fiction could you please explain how these features are verifiable as per OSM requirements.
osm.wiki/Verifiability

Regards Bernard.

Fiction removed, this is private garden and a verge.

Joined up crossing roads for you.

Fiction removed, removed residential area from middle of the road.

Hi timdine, if it helps the deletion was of Way: Pomquet And Afton 23 (149983566), a boundary=administrative. On the same day Way: Paqtnkek-Niktuek 23 (343745602) was amended also by Dartmouthmapmaker.

This info can be obtained by temporarily reverting the changeset in JOSM.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately in drawing the park you have dragged the school outline out of shape. The single school outline covered the whole area bur are there two or even three separate school areas as well as the park area? If so all the areas should be carefully drawn as the public would only have open access to the park.

It might be best to revert this changeset and start again. I don't have first hand info of the area's but if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

No trouble, glad to help in fact. If you need any help please just ask, click on my name then send a message.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your inadvertent duplicate pub node, placed the data for the proper pub on the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, do the gardens really extend through the middle of the houses? I suspect not so the front and back gardens should be drawn/mapped separately. Also in a lot of cases you've got the garden corners touching but not joined.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Review requested, no problem. Have fun, there's plenty of guidance when you want to progress your mapping, just ask for help if you get stuck.

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It is the practice in OSM to map what is on the ground and verifiable, in this case, the displayed name. I've therefore reinstated the correct name of the building that houses Clapham Library. It may be that the building is referred to locally as the library building, but I doubt that when folk refer to it as such they are implying that it is actually named "The Library Building".

If you are sure that local folk use the name "The Library Building" then you might be justified in adding the tag loc_name=The Library Building.
Please see here:- name=*

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I have reverted this changeset because it is fiction. OSM, if you are not aware is a live worldwide database from which folk compile maps. There are methods whereby editing can be tested offline.

If I can help at all please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, You are either not getting notification of changeset comments, ignoring them and also seem to be unable to respond to them. They are given in part due to your review request.

So I have removed hundreds of nodes tagged ele, which seem to be from several joined up GPS traces. This has also removed the huge GPS trace.

Please try not to upload GPS traces to the database. They can be uploaded to OSM via JOSM, please see here :- osm.wiki/Upload_GPS_tracks

Regards Bernard

P.S. I've also squared up lots of buildings you've added.

Hi, your building all have to be tagged building=yes for them to have meaning in OSM database. The tag name=Edificio has no meaning to the database and is ignored by most if not all rendering software.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've drawn the building in.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to mention that your new paths are isolated from the overall highway network. As such they cannot be used for routing. I see also that the paths seem to serve the school. Those section of path only serving the school should be tagged accordingly to deter access by the general public when using an OSM derived map.

If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please be careful when adding highways not to place new ways over existing ways. Please section up the existing ways then add your new tags/descriptions to the section of existing way that needs amending.
You had actually made several duplicated ways by placing paths on-top of the old railways. I have removed all the duplications in your three change-sets to date. Sectioning the existing way then placing your new data on those existing way.

It's also not a good idea to delete a way needing amending then adding a new amended way. This remove all previous history of OSM changes.

If you need help please just ask,
Regards Bernard.