BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 62424538 | over 7 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Fitzroy Place is already mapped in OSM, please see here :- way/27362636
Regards Bernard. |
| 62282801 | over 7 years ago | Hello Tony,
Regards Bernard |
| 62398494 | over 7 years ago | Hi, I amended the opening hours tag to suit OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 62398427 | over 7 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I reinstated the parking tag because that is what the area is used for, I added a private tag to indicate the access is not open to the general public.
Regards Bernard. |
| 62060260 | over 7 years ago | Hi OK, but you actually duplicated the two ways with the area. I've had another close look and removed the false one-ways, reinstated the T junction and added an area:highway=residential to the extent of the highway surrounding the junction. Regards Bernard |
| 62321988 | over 7 years ago | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This whole area is tagged as a paved pedestrian area so would represent the public access area you might be thinking of. Regards Bernard |
| 58010536 | over 7 years ago | Hi, I notice that Way: Rosie Hackett Bridge (578993120) and Way: Rosie Hackett Bridge (578973718) are exactly on top of each other, one must be a duplicate. The tagging of both ways is identical, unfortunately the restrictions differ. Thus I can't determine which way should be removed. If left it wiil at some point disrupt routers. As you are the sole mapper tagger of these ways perhaps you are better placed to determine which way should be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 62271595 | over 7 years ago | Hello There, I just wanted to point out that you've inadvertently added a lot of duplicated nodes. Please see here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-7.36805&lat=52.43523&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way If you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 62205799 | over 7 years ago | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I tweaked a few of your new areas and tags, specifically changing the building=residential to landuse=commercial. Regards Bernard. |
| 62017276 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
On the standard OSM site rendering, leisure=park does not have a tree symbol, it's just a light green colour. I think it's only natural=wood that has the tree symbol.
Unless it is a specific map rendering which shows par with a tree symbol. If so can you say what map it is please. Regards Bernard |
| 62017276 | over 7 years ago | No response so I've removed the duplicated park within park areas. |
| 62146815 | over 7 years ago | Hi, changeset is reverted, all is as before your edit. Regards Bernard |
| 62146815 | over 7 years ago | Hello, No problem I'll leave well alone. I queried the deletion because when one see's a new mapper removing stuff on their first edit it's usually inadvertent or worse. I've not had much to do with indoor mapping but if you need help feel free to ask. Regards Bernard |
| 62146815 | over 7 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
| 62119054 | over 7 years ago | Hello Frank,
Regards Bernard. |
| 62119054 | over 7 years ago | Hi, does the road name Thorley Street extend right up to Whittington Way? Regards Bernard. |
| 62117224 | over 7 years ago | Hi, I've amended the roof level tag. The building does have a pitched roof thus roof levels should equal 1. Please see :- building:levels=* Regards Bernard |
| 62117208 | over 7 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've tagged these residential dwellings as houses. Building=detached doesn't describe what the building is. Regards Bernard |
| 62109898 | over 7 years ago | Changes reverted, this is a residential dwelling and area. Regards Bernard |
| 61636456 | over 7 years ago | I've retified the problems here for you, I think I've got the all. It would be a great help and make the map look better if you could consider the above points in the future. Regards Bernard |