Hi.
Revert bus stop name, the stop name is not the street name, the street name is separately tagged. The stop name is that held on the Napton database and is often on the bus stop sign.
Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You inadvertently removed the landuse=residential tag from the village area outline and substituted your house data. Your house outline and tagging are OK.

I've amended the landuse data, (removed house data from it), tweaked house outline, added garage. Amended address data to OSM practice.

All is well, thanks for contributing to OSM. Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I take you to mean the company has shut down. If the building is still there it should not have been deleted from OSM. There are means to tag buildings/companys as not in use.
Firstly is the building still there? If it is I can revert your changes to reinstate the original data back to OSM. Then amend the tagging.

Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Building added and ammended the tagging, hope that's OK.
Regards Bernard

Hi, the assumed default is intermittent=no, so I've removed it.
Regards

Beach is removed from Charing Cross.

Hi, 35 change-sets reverted. Took a while to do.

How did that happen?

Regards Bernard

Reverted hundreds of duplicated objects.

Hi, 410 objects reverted, path duplications.

Hi 215 items reverted, duplications of the same path.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Those two lines you deleted were part of address interpolation for properties on The Frame. As such they should not have been deleted. There is a problem in that the lines don't line up with blocks of houses, so even if I reinstate the lines I can't properly position them. Perhaps you know where 1 to 25 and 2 to 24 The Frame are located?

Regarding the playground, with your new area, there are 3 playgrounds. So I've removed one POI playground, (a node that was on the outer boundary). Tagged the outer boundary as a park, (removing the unnecessary tags of access=yes, max_age=0, min_age=0 tags). Your new area I've removed the access=yes tag (in the absence of a negative access tag it is implied that access is allowed).

Regards Bernard

Hi is the pond name verifiable? Please see osm.wiki/Verifiability
Regards Bernard

I removed the intermittent=no tag, if the tag is missing on a waterway the assumption is intermittent=no. Therefore no need for the negative tag.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended the pond names to capitalise each word, all proper names should have each word capitalised.

Regards Bernard

fiction removed

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can you please state exactly what problem you are trying to resolve and consider that there may be a problem with RunKeeper?

I've just looked at the changes you've made and I can see no real value in them. In fact, the ones that change 'designated' to merely 'yes' actually remove value from the database.
A trunk road in the UK has implied use for foot and cycle traffic so there is no need to add the bicycle=yes, foot=yes tags. Specific cycleways on or by a trunk road should be mapped as they carry specific designations.

I would suggest that there was no problem with OSM data and that these changes ought to be reverted.

If I can help please just ask, Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You may not be aware that OSM is a live worldwide database from which many folk produce maps. Thus it is important that the database is kept free of any errors and in this case tests. (There are places where you can keep personal mapping data, even fictional mapping data but that is not on OSM.)

For the above reasons I've removed all your un-tagged ways placed on-top of highways.

I hope you can understand this action. Regards Bernard

Hello, I just wanted to point out that a great many of the estate tracks you've added are not joined at their junctions. At many junctions one end node is on-top of another way node. They need to be joined or merged to each other and the wider network, thus to allow routing throughout the network.

I also notice you've added some ways with no tagging at all. The use of highway=road does not convey any information as to the highway type. Road is only used when the type of highway cannot be ascertained. Your extensive mapping seems to imply your awareness of highway types. I can see from aerial imagery that a lot of these ways are estate service roads or tracks.

I congratulate you on the precision you've used to map these roads, very good work.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, are you sure this is the route of the public footpath? Has it been diverted southwards to this position? Because it's unusual for a public footpath to be a dead end way.
Regards Bernard

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed the sidewalk tag this is used for a footway beside a street where the sidewalk runs parallel a carriageway. Please see sidewalk=*

Regards Bernard.