BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172780678 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks like the ways you modified should not have been joined to the central service road. They are, as can be seen from imagery, aircraft parking positions, not service roads. I've amended the map. Regards Bernard. |
| 172680493 | 3 months ago | Hi, Just wanted to point out that Way: 1434484063 doesn't look like a residential plot, no dwelling, though I could be wrong. Regards Bernard. |
| 172622023 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Have the woods really been permanently removed? Regards Bernard. |
| 172368672 | 3 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Youve made a few duplicated highways which could cause disruption to routing. I think I've removed the duplicate. Please try not to do this. Regards Bernard. |
| 172348345 | 3 months ago | House drawn as per OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 172159794 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Building is added with tags and address amended to OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 172146964 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The address 5 Laurel Grove is included in the building outline tags, addr:housenumber=1-25
Regards Bernard. |
| 172100728 | 3 months ago | Hi, Sorry I made this comment to the wrong changeset. |
| 172100728 | 3 months ago | Hi, On the Cambridgeshire map, a footpath is shown between and to the back of the garages. |
| 172008085 | 3 months ago | That's done!
|
| 172016802 | 3 months ago | I've removed the Coop brand and operator tags. |
| 172008085 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you've mapped the whole building as the business, it was previously described as a house. So the question is does the business really occupy the whole building? If not then the business should be represented by a node/POI placed within the house outline. I would think it's actually a contact office, I can help with this if you like. Regards Bernard. |
| 171933598 | 3 months ago | Hi, Several highway sections of the park run were placed on top of existing highways. This made duplication of highways that could cause disruption of routing. I've removed the duplicate sections and amended the route relation to suit. Regards Bernard |
| 171922553 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The pub is already mapped as an outline of the premises, Way: The Regal (1204234283). I've removed the POI as it's duplication of data. Regards Bernard. |
| 171884761 | 3 months ago | Hi, You inadvertently squared up the long boundary line Way: 449518772. I've reinstated it to the original position so all is well. Regards Bernard. |
| 171788026 | 3 months ago | Hi, I just wanted to point out, in case you missed it, that there are several problems in this changeset as noted in the warnings above. I've removed several sections of duplicated cycleway which could have impacted on routing. I've not looked at the other problems. Regards Bernard. |
| 171803156 | 3 months ago | Hi, The church building is alreaddy mapped so I've added you new tags to it. OSM policy is "One feature, one OSM element", please see:- osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Regards Bernard. |
| 171795177 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM maps ground truth, what is physically present at a place, and it must be verifiable to others who pass by. So I wonder, is there actually a language school here or is it an office in the bungalow? I can see no evidence of a school. Regards Bernard. |
| 171771732 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The business doesn't occupy the whole building, so I've reverted the building tags. I added the tag office=financial to your POI. Regards Bernard. |
| 171757952 | 3 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Good start to your mapping, that's actually two houses, I've amended. Regards Bernard. |