BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161388350 | 11 months ago | Hi, Will you be coming back next year to correct the crop tag for each field in this area. If you don't think you can then please don't use the crop tag as next year it will be misleading. Regards Bernard. |
| 161223985 | 11 months ago | No response so I've removed it. |
| 161317086 | 11 months ago | I tweaked the tags to OSM practice. |
| 161314683 | 11 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The trig point is returned to its original position. Please be careful not to inadvertently move features, this is a live worldwide database. |
| 161291159 | 11 months ago | Hi, A few duplicated paths here, I think I've fixed them. |
| 161288397 | 11 months ago | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've joined the south end onto Middlesex Road. |
| 161320512 | 11 months ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reviewed your additions. Very large area Way: 1350978574 is not a house, I've removed it. Fields unjoined from road center lines. If you zoom right in you can more precisely draw features. Way: Landrace house (1350978577) should be drawn round the house only. I amended areas. The same apply to Way: 1350978582, I've corrected. Your residential areas Way: 1350978575 and Way: 1350978576 are drawn within an existing residential area so duplication, which I've removed. Farmland fields like Way: 1350978584 should be drawn around the field only, not to include other areas. If they have to include other areas then you should make multipolygons. Much easier to make small areas of single fields. I've corrected this area. Please take a bit of time to find out OSM best practices of mapping. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 161284433 | 11 months ago | Yes could be, I was having problems uploading this morning. Then went on to look at other things. Kept trying to upload then everything went at once. As I recall there weren't any conflicts so I take it all was OK as far as the data was concerned. |
| 161284433 | 11 months ago | Oh, Sorry about that, I tweaked a footpath from the common and playing field areas |
| 161181973 | 11 months ago | Hi, Firstly anything added to OSM must be verifiable. OSM verifiability is explained here:- osm.wiki/Verifiability An explanation by Frederik Ramm, a leading OSM moderator is given here:- https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/72910/how-should-i-map-an-online-shopping-store In summation, anything added to OSM must be on the ground truth and physically verifiable at the site. Regards Bernard. |
| 161181973 | 11 months ago | Online shops are not allowed on OSM |
| 161247059 | 12 months ago | Hi, There's some misunderstanding. Firstly OSM is a database openly maintained by anyone who wants to contribute. The only stipulation to features in the database is that they are ground truth and verifiable by anyone else. You have removed the tracks across that field from the OSM database. I'm not contesting that as they were not linked to the general highway network. Some aerial imagery showed the tracks some didn't. OSM is not Google Maps, Google Maps is a private company. The tracks across the field are not on Google Maps anyway so you have no worry there. There is a track on OSM and Google Maps leading to the caving club. Whether it has a public legal status or not is of no import, anyone can add such features to any map. If you can see it, in any way, you can map it. Regards Bernard. |
| 161250291 | 12 months ago | Hi, The name is not the house number so I've removed that tag. Regards Bernard. |
| 161250208 | 12 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreeMap. House 33 is mapped so the node is not needed. Regards Bernard. |
| 161247059 | 12 months ago | Hi, All land is private whether it has a PRoW is irrelevant. At the moment no PRoW is claimed across this land. If/when a PRoW is claimed then confirmation would be determined upholding or dismissing the claim. |
| 161214589 | 12 months ago | Hi, Thats now reverted. You might need to reload or refresh your browser to see the revert. Regards Bernard. |
| 161214589 | 12 months ago | Hi, Thanks for responding. I can easily revert the whole changeset to the original OSM state. As you've got a backup I think that's the best thing to do. Would you like me to do this? If so please don't make any further changes until after the revert. Regards Bernard. |
| 161214589 | 12 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Just to let you know that you've added a huge number of untagged nodes. Could you please look at tagging or removing them? Also, a lot of nodes are outside the building outline. I don't know a lot about indoor mapping, that a specialist area, but are you missing the corridors and internal room layout? Regards Bernard. |
| 161223985 | 12 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. This AED location does not seem correct. I cannot find it on the fitness4less website and the site looks like a private residence. The point of mapping AED's to OSM is to aid the public in accessing the nearest AED in an emergency. Unfortunately this AED lacks vital information ti assist the public. If it;s only for your own private use it ought not be on OSM. This webpage:- emergency=defibrillator will help with appropriately tagging an AED. Regards Bernard. |
| 161198780 | 12 months ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Features added to OSM must be ground truth and verifiable. Thus I've relocated your building from the middle of the highway. Regards Bernard. |