Hi, I just wanted to inform you that ways 720603345 and 720603350 are untagged.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've unjoined the houses from the path and another area outline. I also squared up the houses. The squareing up of houses is easy with the ideditor. You just highlight/lrft-click the house, then right click and click the square icon, shortcut Q. It's done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your requested review, I've reverted your changes because you removed the valid farmyard tag and added the fictional tag making the farmyard scrub.

Please don't add fiction to the live worldwide OSM database from which hundreds of maps are compiled daily.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I've removed the fords as I believe they are fiction.

Hi, These grass areas don't extend over asphalt roads and paths. Not do they join onto the center lines of highways. Because it would obstruct traffic.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Some of your newly added fences do not seem to make science, fences and gates in the middle of what looks like open fields. Also some fences cross over others with no join. Could you please look at this problem?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've got a large wood area Way: 866283146 on top of a large scrub area Way: 1348072288. This doesn't seem logical, I think it should be wood or scrub not both. Could you please re-think these areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've added the address and website, please check.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If it's a farm access road then the tag would be access=agricultural. The tag vehicle:access=no would exclude public vehicles but remember some routers would stop delivery vehicles fro accessing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If there is some form of access then the tag access=no would be incorrect. You have added the tag motor_vehicle=no which excludes public vehicle access, that's correct. It looks like the general access tag should be access=agricultural, thus I've amended the tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's not logical to have foot and cycle access allowed on a highway tagged access+no. I assume you mean the is no vehicle access in which case the tag would be vehicle:access=no. I've amended the tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Actually, these highways do connect to a pedestrian area highway, so they are not really disconnected. Whether they are considered routable by apps or by yourself is not reasonable grounds to delete them. Anything that is ground truth and verifiable is welcomed in the OSM database. If you can't make amendments to correct the problems you see this again is not reason for deletion. Best to leave it, maybe someone else can make improvements.

Thus I've reverted the deletions.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This again is a designated public footpath, although in this case it looks like the Highway Authority has given permission for cycle use. I've amended the tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The original tags on this highway were correct. It is a designated public footpath extending along Meadowside to Eastwick Drive. So unless there is explicit permission for cycling you are not legally allowed to cycle along here, even though there may be nothing to inhibit/prohibit cycle use.

I've reinstated the proper tags so that the OSM database has the correct information.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tagged the driveway as per OSM practice. I've added the building and tagged that with the name etc. Please make any corrections necessary. Need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You can square up the buildings (they'll look better then). Right-click on the building outline, then click the square icon from the drop-down menu (shortcut Q).

Regards Bernard.

Hello, You've been moving boundary lines and leaving a lot of untagged nodes. I've corrected some of these. Could you please check your work to correct any more inadvertent anomalies?

Regards Bernard.

They certainly look attached to me.

Hi, Thanks.
I've made a few changes to tag the houses and company that seem the most appropriate to OSM practice. Please see if you agree?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for responding. I've divided the building into two houses. Which one does your business office occupy, please?

Regards Bernard