Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because you somehow dragged several features out of alignment, warnings were given above. I have kept the carwash mapped though.

Regards Bernard,

You are quite correct about the garden polygon which is an enclosed area feature. But adding the tag barrier=fence to the area feature, then joining another area similarly tagged feature to it makes for two fences on the join which is incorrect. In cases like this, the fence ought to be added as a separate feature thus avoiding duplication.

There are actually more problems, one is that there are many gaps in the barrier lines that provide highway access into the garden areas, The barrier doesn't enclose the entire property. Another is that these are not all fences, it can be seen that some barriers are walls or hedges. Also I very much doubt if the barriers extend through the middle of the semi-detached houses.

You've also mapped the gardens as extending over the buildings.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've duplicated a lot of these fence lines between the houses. Fence on top of a fence.

Regards Bernards

Hi, I wonder if you could help, are there fences around every aircraft? As I recall from a long time ago there were no fences.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Does the Norwich Aviation Centre occupy the whole building as your amendment implies? If not then the business should be mapped as a node within the building. The website address implies the business is within the Airport Park & Ride Building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Yes OSM Inspector, here's a link, :- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.97797&lat=52.06026&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
It's updated usually every 24 hours. I go through the UK geometry every morning correcting what I can.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder has Natwest ceased to operate from the building and have the two ATMs on the High Street been removed? If so the map ought to be amended to this effect.

Lastly does Gail's occupy the whole building and is it a cafe as well as a bakery.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, When you add steps to a path please section off the path and remove the section where the steps are. Adding the steps like you did here makes duplication of a highway. I've removed the 4 sections of the path here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The cantonment blocks would not all be named "Cantonment". The overall cantonment area is named/tagged as "Nashik Cantonment" so your building names are not needed. The buildings could be described as individual cantonments but not named cantonments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You made lots of duplicated highways here which I've removed. Please try not to do this as it disrupts routing. Check before you upload.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The business doesn't occupy the whole building so the tags shouldn't go on the building outline. I've made it a POI node within the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm pretty sure that's not a pond, I've reverted it back to grass.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately, the highways you added are all duplicating existing highways, this could disrupt routing. I've removed all the duplicates.

If a mapped feature in OSM needs amending/correcting it's OSM best practice to amend/correct any existing feature. Not delete the existing feature and remap and not simply duplicate the existing feature by mapping on top of it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Several tags in OSM are implied by their absence. In the absence of the tag oneway=yes, it is implied that these highways have no one-way restriction. Thus, the tag oneway=no is not needed. There are only a few special exceptions to this guidance.

There are thousands of highways without a oneway=no tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That should be building=school, the amenity=school tag is on the overall school grounds outline. I've amended to suit.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you removed the a bridge on the bridleway. Thus I;ve reverted the changeset. I also added the designation of Meadow Lane.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed Way: 1334240411 and Way: 1334240412 as they duplicate an existing highway. The existing highway is a designated bridleway, I've tagged it as such.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated highways removed.
Way: 1333734915
Way: 1333734916
Way: 1333589282

More duplicated ways as above comment.

Way: 1333719628
Way: 1333719629
Way: 1333719630
Way: 1333719633
Way: 1333719631
Way: 1333719627

I've deleted the following highways as they duplicated existing highways thus probably disrupting routing. I think all relations are maintained.

Way: 1333719652
Way: 1333719651
Way: 1333719650
Way: 1333719649
Way: 1333719648
Way: 1333719647
Way: 1333719646
Way: 1333719645
Way: 1333719644
Way: 1333719643
Way: 1333719642
Way: 1333719641
Way: 1333719640
Way: 1333719639
Way: 1333719638
Way: 1333719637
Way: 1333719636
Way: 1333719635
Way: 1333719634

Regards Bernard.