BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 158574680 | about 1 year ago | tweaked shapes |
| 158571903 | about 1 year ago | Repositioned and tagged. |
| 158570193 | about 1 year ago | Hi, It is OSM practice not to use abbreviations for names, I've changed Rd to Road. Regards Bernard. |
| 158633687 | about 1 year ago | No response so I've removed it. |
| 158873593 | about 1 year ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Requested review, I think you should study the beginners and help sections before making more edits. Unfortunately, your mapping mostly duplicated highways, which disrupted routing. Thus, I've reverted the whole changeset. If you need help please ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 158636165 | about 1 year ago | Hi, I've removed the 4.5km track Way: 1329989424 as it duplicates the existing track and might disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
| 158861837 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've tweaked the address to suit OSM practice and squared up the shape. Regards Bernard |
| 158802291 | about 1 year ago | Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated track that you added. These track features look more like field boundary lines than tracks, at best they would only be paths IMO. Regards Bernard |
| 158829789 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reverted this changeset because the fairways are already mapped, Regards Bernard, |
| 158767825 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. No need to have the business feature mapped twice, I removed the name from the building outline leaving the node as a business POI. Regards Bernard. |
| 158546746 | about 1 year ago | I found the website, looks like it's the whole building, consolidated tags on building |
| 158633687 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Features added to OSM must be accurate and verifiable. I can find nothing showing that this business is positioned on the street here. Can you please provide the company's address so it can be properly positioned? A business that has only an online presence to the public, (no physical office for the public to visit), should not be added to OSM. If the office is not here then the POI should be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 158544636 | about 1 year ago | Hello Julian,
Regards Bernard. |
| 158549393 | about 1 year ago | Oh I reverted your changes. |
| 158549393 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap. You mapped the business on a block of terrace houses. From your website I found the correct place of the business and placed a node there. Regards Bernard. |
| 158544636 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The square is already mapped and named as an outline of the whole pedestrian area, Relation: Market Square (12935230). If this is correct, then your new node is not needed as it duplicates data. Regards Bernard. |
| 158546746 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's OSM practice not to map a feature twice. So if the museum is a business within this building it should be mapped/tagged as a node only, leaving the building mapped/tagged with only the building info. If the museum the whole building then the building is mapped/tagged as the business, there should not be a node mapped as well. I've amended the tags to reflect the former option. If this is incorrect please say and I'll amend further. Regards Bernard. |
| 158483305 | over 1 year ago | Hello citrula, I think whats left is OK. I can't tell if the house name is correct nor do I have info on the solar installation. Regards Bernard. |
| 158317495 | over 1 year ago | Remove obvious fiction. |
| 157724581 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Yes, based on what you consider the road is used for. Regards Bernard. |