Hi, Way: 1253207941 removed as it is duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Way: طريق الجوف (1253207914)
and Way: طريق الجوف (154265995)
are joined together at the north end. Are there 1 or 2 highways, is it a dual carriageway?
Could you please correct this as it will disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just to let you know that roads have been moved off of alignment near the new bridge Way: 1253207911

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The areas of Way: 661461356, Way: 661461347, Way: 661461352, and Way: 661461358 look strange shapes. In two of them, the outlines self-intersect. I can't remedy the self-intersection not knowing what the shape should be.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You somehow duplicated a few building outlines. I've made amendments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed duplicated buildings and amended the existing building outlines to suit your new info. I amended some of the tagging of addresses and squared up some building outlines.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Placing buildings within buildings is not the right thing to do. Rather the existing building should be split into the relevant new areas and each new area tagged. I've amended the existing school building to suit your new info.

Regards Bernard.

Also highways within school grounds would not be classed as residential, they would be service roads. In fact a lot of them actually look like footpaths.

I've made some amendments.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to let you know that placing a highway (Footpath Way: 1252055064) on top of an existing highway (Service Road Way: 673927258) disrupts routing. Thus I've removed the footpath from atop the service road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've added some details, please check to see if it's OK.

Regards Bernard.

The designation of public footpath is correct but horses and cycles may have private or permissive use, their use is not automatically banned. The land owner can permit what they wish as long as the designated use is in no way obstructed or deterred.

The designation is correct.

Designations as per definitive map added.

Hi, A few problems. Way: 1248342808, Way: 1248342809, and Way: 1248342810 are duplications of existing highways. This duplication disrupts routing so I've removed them.

If a way needs amending or correcting this should be done to any existing ways so that the way history is maintained. I've amended the existing highway tags to show the public status as per the Blackburn and Darwen definitive map.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, These two highways are designated as Public Rights of Way. Thus there is public access on foot along these private service roads. I've amended the tags to suit.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This is a natural peak as indicated by osm mappers and the Ordnance Survey so I've reinstated it. You may not deem it necessary to be mapped which is OK but others do, and it does exist. there has been some history of it actually being named.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've moved the spa node off of the road, placing it within the building area of The Circle.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Tower Bridge is already mapped as an attraction, please see here:- node/2079674503#map=19/51.50552/-0.07537&layers=N Thus I've removed your duplicated data.

Regards Bernard.

Regarding Way: 385698843, is this way public or permissive? The tags access=permissive with
designation=public_footpath indicate both. The tags ought be amended to reflect the single correct status.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please be aware of the warnings given above about crossing ways.

What you had somehow done is placed several paths on top of existing paths making for duplication and in one case triplication. If an existing way needs correcting please make the correction to the existing way.

I've removed the duplicated paths,
Regards Bernard.