Hi, Thanks for your concern. You give good advice. Sometimes mistakes do happen though.

Regards Bernard

Hi Will,
I'm sorry to hear of your problems but that is not because of OpenStreetMap, that's because of irresponsible walkers. As I said the tracks are features that are verifiable from many sources and are on many maps and imagery including Ordnance Survey mapping. The highways on OSM where folk can walk are clearly marked as publicly accessible so there is no confusion from OSM mapping.

I have added the tag access=agricultural to the tracks, except the section from Walesby Hill which I'm not sure is only agricultural. You could mark the tracks as access=private if you wish. If there are gates map them also, adding appropriate tags, including locked=yes if applicable. Remember though that as with all maps (except the OSM live database), that it takes time for the changes to trickle down to OSM rendered map apps.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

These tracks are genuine features that can clearly be seen from public places and on aerial imagery. They have been on the OSM database for more than 10 years. The fact that they are on private land is not a reason for them not to be mapped. Thus I've reinstated the tracks.

Regards Bernard.

Reverted in Changeset: 142699360

Hi, You continue to make many mistakes in your mapping, I think you are copying tags from different features. This changeset has lots of buildings tagged also as highways. Worse nearly 300 objects are named "3456" clearly wrong, why do this?

I have been correcting a lot of your mapping on nearly all of your changesets and making comments that have gone unnoticed or ignored. This changeset with nearly 300 mistakes is just too much. So I'll revert this changeset hoping it will get a response from you. Maybe I can help you understand OSM's best practices for mapping.

Regards Bernard.

but this one is to much. So it's best to revert all these chan

Your fiction has been removed or amended as appropriate.

Hi, you forgot to square up and tag these building. I've tagged them for you.

Lots of fiction was removed. The roads are not all named mystreet, building outlines are not highways.

Please take heed of the comments on your changesets and stop this silliness.

Duplicates now removed, and I recall the 20mph for Wales change, All OK.

Simplified the area.

Hi, Ley lines are not verifiable on the ground so are not features that can be physically added to OpenStreetMap. Thus I've removed the line. I also reinstated Royston Cave.

Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately this changeset dragged lots of areas out of alignment. It also introduced an untagged line joining the 3 monuments. The 3 monuments are in the middle of fields, somewhat strange placements?

Thus I've reverted this changeset.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Your two new highways Way: B4382 (1215458354) and Way: B4382 (1215458353) are placed on top of other highways making duplication. Further I would ask if the 20mph limit has only recently been instigated as there is some evidence that it is or was 30mph?

Regards Bernard.

Fiction and duplicated highways are removed.

Hi, Sorry to say that a lot of this is incorrect mapping. Thus most is removed as it's fiction.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A couple of things to point out about OSM best practice. The address tags for the school should go on the school premises outline. The premises are tagged as amenity+school and all buildings within the premises are tagged as building=school. I've made a few amendments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for letting me know. Don't know how it happened as trial reversion of this changeset doesn't restore the missing section. Anyway, I've extended the cycleway so the relations are now OK.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated highway removed

Hi, I've removed some untagged lines and duplicated sections of highways.