BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 137724995 | over 2 years ago | Your silly fiction has been removed. Please don't corrupt the map that is made so that you can benefit. Regards Bernard. |
| 137699904 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Squared up to look neater. |
| 137699775 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You inadvertently made a duplicate highway, (one atop another). A lane like Kettle Lane can be an unclassified highway and a public footpath at the same time and on the same line. I've amended the tags to show this situation. Regards Bernard. |
| 137738216 | over 2 years ago | Node removed. Is the position wrong? |
| 137726625 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Is your POI in the right place north of the farmyard? Some imagery suggests the campsite is in the field east of the farmyard.
Regards Bernard. |
| 137714659 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You inadvertently added a gate to the road. I removed the 160M long gate tag. If the road is gated please place a node at the gate position and tag it as appropriate. Regards Bernard. |
| 137689682 | over 2 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your buildings would look much neater if you were to square them up. This is easy to do in the iD editor. Hover the cursor over the building outline, right-click, choose/click on the square symbol, (third one down). The outline is squared up, save it. Regards Bernard. |
| 137636181 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Thanks for your response, I'll try to explain in more detail.
There are three paths forming a triangle in the field, I've added the correct designations and PRoW ref numbers. I've also added the driveway to be seen as separate from the footpath. Regards Bernard. |
| 137636181 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've inadvertently removed a public footpath, I've reinstated it though.
|
| 137635997 | over 2 years ago | Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The School name, with other tags, is on the school premises outline so is not needed on the building, this is as per OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 137605784 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Are these really motorways? Please see this page:- highway=motorway I've removed a few duplicated sections of highway. There are a few junctions that are not compatible with motorways which I can't remedy. Regards Bernard. |
| 137596884 | over 2 years ago | Hi, You are inadvertently duplicating sections of the highway, I've just removed a couple. Please check before uploading. Regards Bernard. |
| 137566150 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. No need to tag the node as parking because all tags are on the area outline, that will suffice. Regards Bernard. |
| 137538736 | over 2 years ago | If the paths have any legal status can you please show where the legal status can be verified. It is an OSM requirement that anything added to the OSM database must be verifiable to anyone else. For instance, a PRoW is verifiable via the relevant definitive map. A road name can be verified by a sign. If the name "Permissive Path" cannot be easily verified then it does not belong in the OSM database. Regards Bernard. |
| 137544834 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Googles terms are not compatible with OSM, therefore we are not able to use Google as a source of information of any kind. Thus I've removed the tag source=Bing;Google, as I don't think you really took any info from Google. Regards Bernard. |
| 137493322 | over 2 years ago | Hi, the node you've added to the power line bends the power line which would not be correct. Is there a pole here, if so it should be tagged power=pole. If there's no pole there should not be a node. Regards Bernard. |
| 137493221 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Names in OSM as any feature must be verifiable to everyone. I very much doubt a path would be formally or informally named "Permissive Path". Also it's not OSM's practice to join highways to other non-highway features. Thus I've amended some features in this changeset. Regards \Bernard. |
| 137269735 | over 2 years ago | I've put the question to the person who added them. |
| 137264024 | over 2 years ago | Removed a duplicated section of footpath and tweaked barriers. |
| 137263908 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Are you sure folk do not walk these lines as paths? They don't have to be designated paths to exist. If folk walk them then they are highways. Regards Bernard. |