Hi, Duplicated highway line removed.

Hi Matthew,
The tunnel was still there, Way: West Highland Line (1171014292), it's also part of several relations. So I've retagged the tunnel section as the bridge and removed the bridge Way: 1171764240

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I doubt there is both a tunnel and a bridge at this point, you've added both. Could you remedy this please, or assure that both features exist?

I've removed the duplicated walls just to the NW of here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Again some of these buildings are bungalows, thus building=bungalow.
Some of the outlines are drawn covering several dwellings so the tag should be building=residential.
If you are not sure what type of dwelling it is then just leave it as building=yes.

Lastly please limit your changeset uploads to about twenty features. This changeset has well over 2000 objects. It's going to take a long time to check and correct where necessary all that lot.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you're going to change stuff you might as well do it right, a lot of these buildings are not houses, they're bungalows, building=bungalow would be the correct tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I took a little time sorting out several problems here, unfortunately, you've now introduced several more problems/anomalies. I list the details below, could you make amendments, please?

You now have a building (Way: 168987424) within another building (Way: 1171670872).

A garden is tagged as a building, building:levels=1 and layer=1 (a garden is usually implied (with no tag necessary) as level=0, and a garden is not a building).

There are now four features,
(Node: Sun & Beauty Studios (10885796414)
Way: 168987424
Node: 10889513964
Way: 1171495810
all tagged with the address of 147 High Street. It's OSM practice to tag one feature as one OSM element it's a good practice principle. It means one on-the-ground real world feature should be mapped with only one OSM element.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, OSM represents the real world in a worldwide database, fiction, and incorrect mapping are not allowed. You are welcome to add features that are verifiable on the ground.

Thus I've reverted your two changesets because they contained fiction and dragged features out of alignment.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You don't usually need to add oneway=no, (and certainly in these cases it's not necessary). The reason is, that in the absence of a oneway=no tag, two-way is implied.

Hi, What is the line, (Way: 1171007637), that you tag as access=private? Is it a path or road?

Hi, You've not tagged Way: 1171007639 as a highway (highway=cycleway).

Hi, are they public or private gardens, if private gardens access=private would keep the public out.

Hi, The entrance nodes should be on the building outline to show an entrance into the building. I've amended these.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The building Way: 178653278 is a duplication as all the houses are individually mapped, its duplication. I've removed it for you.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are compiled and updated. So it's not the place for testing, there's no embankment and the palace is already named. I've reverted the changes so all is OK.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In all worldwide instances of a railway turntable drawn in the same manner as this one. only the area outline of the turntable is tagged railway=turntable. The nodes joining the railway tracks to the turntable are left untagged.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to let you know that you added the tag highway=footpath to Way: 973101715, this way is part of the residential multipolygon relation. It outlines an outer section/part of the whole relationship. As drawn this way should not have any direct tags, I think you mistakenly thought it should have some tag.

I've removed the footpath tag so all is now good. Please be sure when adding tags to existing untagged ways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Is the Mint Leaf still there as well as Bardo's? Or has Bardo's taken over the place of Mint Leaf, if so the Mint Leaf should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The platform, Way: 177832590 had been dragged out of alignment. I can't tell if anything else is off of alignment so could you have a look, please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've just removed lots of duplicated sections of highways. Please check your work before uploading it?

Regards Bernard

You are still making duplicated highways. please stop as it disrupts routing. OSM is not the place to be testing anyway.