BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 134993094 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, You've got Way: 1163066625, (layer 1 service road) joined to Way: 1163066598 (layer 0 service passageway. Being on different layers they should not be joined together. At the NE end of the building there are sidewalks, service road,s and passageway all joined together.
Regards Bernard. |
| 135050422 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, I've removed the fiction and possibly offensive features you added in the four changesets.
Regards Bernard. |
| 135087788 | almost 3 years ago | The changeset comment should have also referred to reverting fiction. |
| 134880180 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, You're making a lot of duplicate nodes at the end of hedges, I've removed several of them. Regards Bernard. |
| 134882229 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Sorry but thats no reason to introduce incorrect mapping data. What router are you using, have you considered that that may be the problem. |
| 134882229 | almost 3 years ago | I just glanced at another site and a sign on these busways says cycles, buses, and authorized vehicles allowed. Other signs say "Buses Only". |
| 134882229 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Surely PSV's are allowed to use these bus ways, so it should be psv=yes. Regards Bernard. |
| 134575962 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Glad to assist, need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 134736761 | almost 3 years ago | Passageway amended. Could you please stop making these incorrect long passageways? Regards Bernard. |
| 134736247 | almost 3 years ago | Very long building passage amended. |
| 134749018 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, For your information you've been duplicating quite a few nodes at the end of hedges, I think I've removed all the duplicates. Regards Bernard |
| 134802680 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've tweaked your tags to OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 134789790 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If the building is still there (as it was in 2015), then it ought not to be deleted from OSM. Rather the tags should be amended to reflect the current status of the building. There are disused tags that can be used on the building and name. There's also the historic tag that can be added. Regards Bernard. |
| 134789227 | almost 3 years ago | As the service is to a farmyard I would have thought the access would be agricultural, access=agricultural |
| 134791034 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, you've added a building within an existing building, duplication. I've removed the duplication. The business Accenture is mapped as a node with description tags. Regards Bernard. |
| 134767572 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Is the barrier you're wanting to add on the service road at the south corner of the Go Outdoors store? That actually looks to me like a double gate. Just before the car park entry/exit, there is, (or was), a double lift barrier. Though it might not now be in operation due to the public access to the car park. Bernard |
| 134767572 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. In moving the barrier you dragged the highways out of alignment. I've reinstated the barrier node to correct the highways. It looks like this is where the lift-gate is supposed to be. Is there a second barrier or gate near where the speed bump is? Regards Bernard. |
| 134576038 | almost 3 years ago | No response so I've made the corrections. |
| 134443394 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, When amending the garden area tags you should remove the landuse=resisential tag as the gardens are within an existing large residential area. I've amended this block so you can see how it should be. Regards Benard. |
| 134680818 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, You duplicated some sections of highways by placing footpaths on top of existing tracks. I've sectioned up the tracks, tagged them as public footpaths, and then removed the duplicate ways. The numbers for the paths are actually council reference numbers, not names, I've amended these. Regards Bernard. |