OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
134993094 almost 3 years ago

Hi, You've got Way: 1163066625, (layer 1 service road) joined to Way: 1163066598 (layer 0 service passageway. Being on different layers they should not be joined together. At the NE end of the building there are sidewalks, service road,s and passageway all joined together.
Could you have a look at this please?

Regards Bernard.

135050422 almost 3 years ago

Hi, I've removed the fiction and possibly offensive features you added in the four changesets.
If you need help adding genuine mapping please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

135087788 almost 3 years ago

The changeset comment should have also referred to reverting fiction.

134880180 almost 3 years ago

Hi, You're making a lot of duplicate nodes at the end of hedges, I've removed several of them.

Regards Bernard.

134882229 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Sorry but thats no reason to introduce incorrect mapping data. What router are you using, have you considered that that may be the problem.

134882229 almost 3 years ago

I just glanced at another site and a sign on these busways says cycles, buses, and authorized vehicles allowed. Other signs say "Buses Only".

134882229 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Surely PSV's are allowed to use these bus ways, so it should be psv=yes.

Regards Bernard.

134575962 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Glad to assist, need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

134736761 almost 3 years ago

Passageway amended. Could you please stop making these incorrect long passageways?

Regards Bernard.

134736247 almost 3 years ago

Very long building passage amended.

134749018 almost 3 years ago

Hi, For your information you've been duplicating quite a few nodes at the end of hedges, I think I've removed all the duplicates.

Regards Bernard

134802680 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked your tags to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

134789790 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the building is still there (as it was in 2015), then it ought not to be deleted from OSM. Rather the tags should be amended to reflect the current status of the building. There are disused tags that can be used on the building and name. There's also the historic tag that can be added.

Regards Bernard.

134789227 almost 3 years ago

As the service is to a farmyard I would have thought the access would be agricultural, access=agricultural

134791034 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, you've added a building within an existing building, duplication. I've removed the duplication. The business Accenture is mapped as a node with description tags.

Regards Bernard.

134767572 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Is the barrier you're wanting to add on the service road at the south corner of the Go Outdoors store? That actually looks to me like a double gate.

Just before the car park entry/exit, there is, (or was), a double lift barrier. Though it might not now be in operation due to the public access to the car park.

Bernard

134767572 almost 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In moving the barrier you dragged the highways out of alignment. I've reinstated the barrier node to correct the highways. It looks like this is where the lift-gate is supposed to be. Is there a second barrier or gate near where the speed bump is?

Regards Bernard.

134576038 almost 3 years ago

No response so I've made the corrections.

134443394 almost 3 years ago

Hi, When amending the garden area tags you should remove the landuse=resisential tag as the gardens are within an existing large residential area. I've amended this block so you can see how it should be.

Regards Benard.

134680818 almost 3 years ago

Hi, You duplicated some sections of highways by placing footpaths on top of existing tracks. I've sectioned up the tracks, tagged them as public footpaths, and then removed the duplicate ways.

The numbers for the paths are actually council reference numbers, not names, I've amended these.

Regards Bernard.