OK

Hi, it looks as though the SW part of this site has been converted into residential properties, do you want to fix it or shall I.

I feel I must fundamentally disagree with your view about a Cricket FIELD. I have checked some of the other cricket clubs in the S Cumbria area and only those you have mapped show any approximation of an oval most of the others from different mappers, map the Cricket Fields as the whole area of the field as I have done here. This is surely in line with OSM policy of only mapping what you can see on the ground! If an oval doesn't exist on the ground it shouldn't be mapped. I cant see any evidence of ovals in any of the aerial views so why do you want to map a Cricket FIELD as an oval.

Ah your quite right, however in the Bing aerial image, I cant see any oval marked on the cricket FIELD and it should be easily visible, and surely, a cricket oval is a related part of the cricket field; also since there appears to be several different `pitches' (the running area) surely the oval will move depending on which running area is chosen. (I'm not a cricketer so I wouldnt know how they cater for this), If the field is used solely for cricket then surely the current Cricket Field is the most appropriate tag with its area marked as the whole field. However if you feel strongly about this, feel free to change it to what you consider appropriate, or to add an additional approximate oval, although I don't know of any tags which describe a cricket oval, separate from a cricket field. I will attempt to get over to Lindal in the next week or two and ask some cricket club member what their preference would be!

If the field is used for anything other than cricket then recreation field would probably be better but if is sole use is cricket the cricket fiels would be appropriate. I think it needs some contact with the locals.

On further examination it appears that the area is duplicated it is also tagged as a recreation ground one of these should probably be deleted, leaving tags which best describe the area.

I agree; however its tagged as a cricket field; seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=cricket ; (The area in which the game is played, often defined by a white line). but feel free to alter the tags to better describe the area

There are some tags for marker stones marker=stone just the thing to add to the map before they get buried forever.

OK done.

There are a number of forest access lanes in that area but I can't find any evidence of a public footpath in that area. and since Latter Rigg isn't access land I think it best if I delete it, if that's OK with you.

Wow that's interesting. Why dont you add it as a note to the lane? Although I was under the impression that today Cumbria C. C. is responsible for maintaining these odd byways, and doint a rather inadequate job too.

Does this footpath exist? Way: 129230354. Is it just forest tracks? It doesn't seem to go anywhere.

Thanks for naming this highway. It is in fact an unsurfaced unclassified road PROW Ref U5230 103 according to Cumbria C. C. definitive map. and although it may be unsuitable for most cars I'm sure a 4wd vehicle could manage it. (I think I remember driving it in a road rally in the 1970's) The tracktype should also probably be grade 4 or even 5.
See; tracktype=*?uselang=en-GB

Yes your right dont know how that happened, but its rather easy to drag a node when moving the map no matter how carefully one tries to do it. Put it bach to somewhere near where it was.

Eh; Cant see any change. This changeset doesnt reach the N end of Dunnerholm so I'm a biit at a loss to understand.

OK willdo have made a note of the points to check

Do you want me to check these? I go through Broughton quite regularly. If so is there anything I should particularly look out for?

This beach is fantasy most of it wetland!

This beach is NOT a golf bunker

Dunnerholm Cottages are 3 private dwelling I know the person living in one of them! You are turning this area into pure fantasy!