OK done.

There are a number of forest access lanes in that area but I can't find any evidence of a public footpath in that area. and since Latter Rigg isn't access land I think it best if I delete it, if that's OK with you.

Wow that's interesting. Why dont you add it as a note to the lane? Although I was under the impression that today Cumbria C. C. is responsible for maintaining these odd byways, and doint a rather inadequate job too.

Does this footpath exist? Way: 129230354. Is it just forest tracks? It doesn't seem to go anywhere.

Thanks for naming this highway. It is in fact an unsurfaced unclassified road PROW Ref U5230 103 according to Cumbria C. C. definitive map. and although it may be unsuitable for most cars I'm sure a 4wd vehicle could manage it. (I think I remember driving it in a road rally in the 1970's) The tracktype should also probably be grade 4 or even 5.
See; tracktype=*?uselang=en-GB

Yes your right dont know how that happened, but its rather easy to drag a node when moving the map no matter how carefully one tries to do it. Put it bach to somewhere near where it was.

Eh; Cant see any change. This changeset doesnt reach the N end of Dunnerholm so I'm a biit at a loss to understand.

OK willdo have made a note of the points to check

Do you want me to check these? I go through Broughton quite regularly. If so is there anything I should particularly look out for?

This beach is fantasy most of it wetland!

This beach is NOT a golf bunker

Dunnerholm Cottages are 3 private dwelling I know the person living in one of them! You are turning this area into pure fantasy!

These changes are just vandalism, we have tried to enter a dialogue with you but so far have not heard anything in response! See;- osm.wiki/Vandalism
If you object to the mapping of public footpaths over a golf course then there is a legal process to have them diverted rather than deleting someone's work.

This is just plain ridiculous; you are acting as a vandal!

I agree.and changing paths which are public footpaths as noted in https://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/
and https://apps1.wdm.co.uk/Pipcumbriahms/map.aspx?cg=PROW
is irresponsible at best and could have much worse consequences.
There is extensive notes on how golf courses should be mapped in leisure=golf_course. To convert a whole beach ino a golf bunker is ridiculous. As was changing Dunnerholme Cottages into offices. Please seek help!

Is this really an abandoned line? I was under the impression that this had always been a single line. So what is the purpose of this?

Your suggestion sounds like a agreeable compromise, thanks I'll add demolished to the tags and put a photo in geograph.org next time I go past. Interestingly Google streetview still shows it as it was in 2006-2010, gives an indication of how often its updated. https://earth.google.com/web/@54.15213186,-3.22891386,28.22658539a,0d,60y,355.27199315h,85.93947865t,0r/data=IhoKFlpkS2pQb25XUUdZeVZGYnBIbjJwNFEQAg

The only signs are the overgrown tracks, All buildings have been removed. The area is still fenced off though; I can send you a photo? Is it possible to put a photo or link in this discussion?. It closed in about 2015; given how much the has reverted to nature I'm inclined to delete it completely. Unlike old abandoned railways or quarries which leave a near permanent mark on the lanscape this area would not be noticed at all if you didnt know it was there!

I'm pleased that you are now satisfied. I will probably be walking that area again in a few days I'll try to remember to do a gps trace and see how the height of the two ends of Grey Crags compare. This was certainly more interesting than the rather boring activity of adding houses to the N end of Askham, or adding walls hedges and farmland, which I have been doing recently. I'm also surprised that this is a Marilyn as I said earlier because the drop to the S is only about 20 to 30 m. because of Cocklakes, far less the the required 150 m.

With a stated height of 334 m.