OpenStreetMap
Andrew Chadwick's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Andrew Chadwick
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1401737 | BobF4253 | Cutteslowe Allotments |
|||
| 108109 | Andrew Chadwick | Residential close without speed limit |
|||
| 108106 | Andrew Chadwick | Residential close without speed limit http://www.itoworld.com/map/124?lon=-1.21748&lat=51.74922&zoom=15&fullscreen=true&fullscreen=true |
|||
| 108108 | Andrew Chadwick | Residential close without speed limit |
|||
| 1442531 | Happy Hobo | The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
|
|||
| 112564 | m902 | Moved from OpenStreetBugs:
|
|||
| 530071 | This is still cycle path which is usable. (Just looked up a route using this stretch of road and it suggested going on cycle path, then onto the road here, then back onto cycle path!) |
||||
| 207636 | William James | This cycle route has been closed by the Council. It now has "cyclists dismount" signs at both ends. |
|||
| 572887 | This whole area is currently under development ("Barton Park"), progress can be seen e.g. from the ring road. Project website appears to be here: http://www.bartonparkoxford.com/ |
||||
| 150388 | Andrew Chadwick | First up: great work on this area, people! Could a better (less highly visible on all renderings) notation be found for the subterranean bits? "Building" seems somewhat wrong for the Gladstone Link tunnel (more of a delving?), perhaps best left as a simple tunnel. I'd suggest building:part=yes areas (building:part=*) for the subterranean parts, like the rad cam dome. Leave them not tagged with building=yes, since we already have a separate area for "the above-ground outline of the building". Sort of a "principle of least surprise" thing: users of the map expect a single outline reflecting the above-ground stuff. |