Aleksandar Matejevic's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 176386946 | 2 days ago | How can admin_level=6 of Macau be a part of admin_level=6 of China? You have put Hengqin Port Transportation Hub Platform as a part of Macau, and therefore it should be excluded from Xiangzhou |
| 176376102 | 4 days ago | Hi, distrito boundaries are now broken, can you fix this? |
| 165465644 | 4 days ago | Hi Rukkhadevata, can you answer to the 蕉饼电脑 comment since I have very similar question? |
| 176202028 | 5 days ago | There is a Pingtan boundary present at admin_level=6 relation/3263974. This one is de-jure boundary. If you wanted this admin_level=5 to be de-facto I think boundary=administrative is not a proper tag. You should, maybe, use boundary=special_economic_zone if there are some different laws applied for this area. Current tagging is making overlap on admin_level=5 administrative boundary type which is the worst solution applied. |