I have reverted this changeset because it broke a lot of administrative relations, for example whole East Timor relation was removed. Please be more careful with the relations in your future edits.

Happy mapping

Hi Sal73x,
I see that you have started one admin_level=7 relation, but it is incomplete. Can you finish the work or remove it if this is incorrect edit.

Clear, thanks, but what about relation/1469659 is this ok?

Thanks for the detailed answer. You have entered latest official numbers, I will recheck a bit more for a correct value since city did grew in size since 2004.

You have put the lower population number on node/572557865 which represents Hama, looks like a huge drop of population which is not in line with the census data. Can you fix this?

I have found out the issue and reverted the change, corrected tagging to prevent future mistakes

Hi fserges,
why have you changed admin_level=6 to 5 for the raions arround Sevastopolj, while all other raions on Crimea adre admin_level=6

Awesome!!! Thank you

Hi ilias_
I see that you have removed some relations due to that document you have put, but can you please add rest what are new admin_level=6 relations, now this is the only part of Morocco that has not admin_level=6 boundary

Hi Nozrak,
Do you thing that admin_level=5 may be too high for Chakma Autonomous District Council? It should be part of Lawngtlai district so previous admin_level=6 seems like more appropriate.

Hi Rippledot,
Tahulandang admin_level=5 relation relation/18226441overlaps with relation/14907627 which already covers that area.

Can you check what is the valid state and adjust admin_level value or modify relations so there is no overlap?

Hi Ksusha Zhegolko,
are you sure about this change from admin_level=6 to admin_level=8. I do understand your point, but since these are city districts of the Toshkent, they should be in the same "rank" as other districts in Uzbekistan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdivisions_of_Uzbekistan . Or is there special district for the Toshkent, because currently it looks like no admin2 level exist in the area of the capital

Good change

Thanks for a very fast reply. Happy mapping

Hi aq123,
Can you confirm that this pool name=Fitness is correct, it looks like descriptive one

Hi muralito,
I think there is a potential mistake with some river names in this changeset. You have added name:es=Arroyo de la Invernada to way/116896246 , way/1303176906 and way/1303176905 which seems not to be correct both per IGM, IGBE and Brazilian Army Topographic Maps. Can you explain your change? Also way/116895878/ has the similar issue. I think that these mentioned rivers are creating Arroio Invernada but should not have that name

Hi Tellurium,
please do not add administrative buildings in relations, admin_center role is for the place, not for the building.

Hi smeòrach,
I have a question about Leverburgh . Should the name tag be Leverburgh instead of An t-Òb because that is old name, renamed to Leverburgh in 1921. I agree that Gaelic name shoud remain the same but maybe name=Leverburgh and old_name=An t-Òb would be better solution?

Hi Kilkenni, are you sure that name for suburb node/3252578372 is "Химчистка"

Thanks for the explanation