Hello Woodpeck, how should I know that the other tags have no intention (I call them private/unique keys, even others argue that everybody can create his own keys/tags).
Of course I do not like them and I noticed them, but as I read once "we should respect the work of others". This is a conflict situation. I would be happy to be part of an official clean up team/group.
2nd: if I fix an obvious typo or remove an empty tag (but keep some other mistakes) : do you really think this does not improve the OSM quality?
3rd: I would love to be part of the discussion, how to overcome the usual daily typo or private tag creation problem. OSM should be machine readable without hundreds of known exceptions.
PS: I feel really sorry for disapointing you.
I hope we can find a solution for this,
Alexander

wikipedia=*#Examples

Hi aris hidayanto, please follow the OSW wiki. wikipedia="lang:Article Name", not "http..". see wikipedia=*
Thanks, Alexander

typo amentity not menity

Hi Anish Thapa, please use tourism=hotel, not menity=hotel. see details here:
tourism=hotel
Thanks, Alex

Hi Jens, please take care and do not insert many broken tags! Like "+"=<empty> or "-"=<empty> etc.
Thanks, Alex

Hi JanMattsson, for way/86326283 you entered a wrong format for wikipedia tag (also in last days again I think). Please follow the OSM wiki, telling wikipedia="lang:Article Name", see
wikipedia=*#Examples
Thanks, Alex

Hi ptitaz, please follow the OSM wiki.
wikipedia="lang:Article Name" not "http.."
PLease see details here:
wikipedia=*#Examples
Thanks Alex

Hi Lucas514, please follow the OSM wiki for the wikipedia tag. wikipedia="lang:Article Name" not "http..".
Please see wikipedia=*#Examples
Thanks, Alex

Hi Lucas514, please follow the OSM wiki:
wikipedia="lang:Article", not "http..".
wikipedia=*#Examples
Thanks, Alex

Hi tuantran2431997, at node/4929089798 you entered many bad tags. Please be carefull. Regards, Alex

Hi rosomak - again,
way/492875837 also has empty languse tag. KR, Alex

Hi rosomak, you entered a broken tag "landuse= " at way/491418133 . can you fix this please Thanks, Alex

Hi Extrabrandt, amenity=shop is not a valid tag. see OSM wiki. KR, Alex

wrong comment: fix shop

Hi hedd2, amenity=shop is an invalid tag. Alex

Hi Koju Bhakta, please do not enter unknown tags that are similar to existing ones. OK = "addr:city" but "city" or"addr;city" is wrong. Thanks, Alex

Hi woodpeck,

in taginfo I saw an "addr;city"-key.
which I tried to fix for node/4908609673 which is close by. But by accident I moved it a little and more sad the key got not fixed. After this I saw, that the building looks rect-like in picture but not in shape of line. So applied the make-rectangle button. Yes I saw the difference in size, but I thought (due to the poor picture quality here) that the real size is perhaps larger than the white square. I estimated the first user knows the size and only made a bad rectangle shape.

I will first fix the 2 addr;city nodes (also node/4908609673),
mark way/499601143 as fixme=no_tags,
and will correct the shape to match the white square in sat-picture, and bring back the old position of the first node (not part of the line).
I hope you agree to this. I'm also sorry for not have worked in a expected way here.
regards, Alex

Hi, rdms, for way/499989814 you entered a broken tag: "41.74928720828849, = -92.72176366054093". Please take care.
Regards, Alex

comment not correct: fix amenity = shop (1 node)