Hello, mga_geo

Problem changeset was reverted via JOSM. You can check the results with 136756315 changeset.
Thank you for your patience and attention to this problem.

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox

Hello, mga_geo

Relation was updated. You can check the results with 136484313 changeset.
Thank you for your patience and attention to this problem.

Regards,
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox

Hello, mga_geo

Problem changeset was reverted via JOSM. You can check the results with 135960868 changeset.
Thank you for your patience and attention to this problem.

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox

Hello mga_geo!

Sorry for the late reply.

Thank you for the review of this changeset. I have noticed that the user hasahi has made some edits via 135545892 changeset . I would be grateful if you could take a look at this changeset. If the updated situation can't resolve the problem, I suggest to revert my changeset.
The indication of the source as BDOrtho is for "informational" purposes. Basically, we take the existing values of "name=*" and "ref=*" and copy them where needed.

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox

Hello CurlingMan13!

Sorry for the late reply.

Thank you for the review of this changeset, your knowledge of the local situation, attention to details and proper fixing helped us a lot!

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox

Thank you for your attention to the changeset.
Mostly we pay attention to imagery marked with "star" as the most relevant imagery for the local situation.
I've used BDOrtho IGN on small zoom, seems like it is almost the same as Ortho HR. If I zoom BDOrtho IGN too much, I'll see irrelevant/old imagery.
If I missed something in this changeset , please let me know or add relevant geometry/tags.

Kind regards,
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox

Thank you for your attention to the changeset.
In our opinion, fixing logical errors on the map is more important, because their presence causes problems with navigation.
If you have up-to-date information, you can add landuse=residential, it will be an great addition.

Kind regards,
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox

Dragged node was fixed. Source: Bing #mapbox_linters_hungary
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132345543

Hello, Warin61!

Thank you for the review of this changeset, your knowledge of the local boundaries and proper fixing of the dragged node has been a great help to us!

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120600761

Hello, eggie!

Sorry for the long response.
Thank you for this fix, according to Wiki OSM.

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118105429

Hello, eggie!

Sorry for the long response.
Thank you for the quick review of this changeset, your expert knowledge of the local situation and operation of navigation systems has been a great help to us!

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118097148

Hello, eggie!

Sorry for the long response.
Thank you for the quick review of this changeset, your expert knowledge of the local situation and operation of navigation systems has been a great help to us!

Regards
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118098365

Hello!
Thank you for the quick correction of the data in this area. Is it possible to add an alt_name tag in this situation, relying on your source?

Best regards

Hello! Thank you for providing up-to-date information! This road has been deleted. Regards
changeset/111300585
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111202259

Hello!
Thank you for providing up-to-date information! This road has been deleted.
Regards

Hello!
Thanks a lot for review!
Our main task is to update the data (roads and poi) according to satellite images, official maps / brochures, Tiger Roads and Strava Heatmap.
Yes, there is some conflict with park boundaries, but we haven't solved it yet.
The slight inaccuracy with the roads at Oak Flat Campground is because, in addition to using Strava Heatmap, we evaluating satellite imagery as well.
The help of the local community in these situations is very important.
So if you have a dissenting opinion to clarify the maps, we'd be glad to see it, as would the rest of the OSM users!

Hello!
Glad to see your review again, it helps us a lot! For previous edit I used park brochure, where no bridges there. I've made necessary fix, according to campground map.

Hello! Thank you for such a detailed review.
I have made the necessary corrections, but there remains one issue that is difficult to resolve, The Durphy Creek / Tan Oak Springs / Lookout Point Trail. According to the official brochure, The Durphy Creek is 2.1 miles long, Tan Oak Springs is 1.9 miles long, Lookout Point Trail is 1.7 miles long. According to the trail descriptions on the campground map, The Durphy Creek / Tan Oak Springs / Lookout Point Trail is 4 miles long, which is causing a conflict.
The question remains open as to where The Durphy Creek ends
and Tan Oak Springs begins, as it is not clear from the official brochure.
I would be glad if the local community could update this information.
brochure: https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/422/files/RichardsonGroveFinalWebLayout2018.pdf
campground map: https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/422/files/richardson_grove.pdf

Hello!
Thank you very much for fixing the wrong edit.
I'll try to be more careful when making edits to OSM.

Thank you for the fast update on the current data in the area.Your expert knowledge of the local situation and operation of navigation systems has been a great help to us!