Thanks for adding Locke Park to Openstreetmap. It looks nice. I added the football field and track across the street. Have fun, add some more details to the map.

Yes, there is a park. Drove by it yesterday using Mapillary. Unfortunately Mapillary images didn't line up due to GPS problem. Y

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55329987

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55368648

I read your note and added access=private to the road.

I'm responding to your request for a review. I looked at your changes and they are far superior to most first time mappers. I hope you keep on mapping.

Hi, Thanks for mapping. I split the gameshop from the bank and added a building where the gameshop is located. Keep on mapping, it's great to have your input.

Thanks for fixing the golf hole number changing name to ref.I was wondering about the correct way to tag it.

Nice addition to OSM. Thanks

Thanks for changing my path to footway. I suppose footway=sidewalk would do the same thing as highway=footway +surface=paved

Thanks for fixing this. I too like keepright for finding these things.

Yes, thanks, I do understand. andygol had changed all highway=pedestrian area=yes to area:highway=pedestrian which caused all plaza type areas in the USA to become black holes in the map. I've been following this note "Note on area=yes
Don't use area:highway=* for plazas and similiar features. These are described by highway=* combined with area=yes, while area:highway=* combined with area=yes is incorrect. Use area:highway=* only to add an area representation for linear highways where a way tagged highway=* without area=yes exists. This applies mostly but not exclusively to highway=pedestrian and highway=footway. Found at osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area#Note_on_area.3Dyes

Yes, that one is ok. This area:highway=pedestrian or footway all seem to have cropped up in 2015. I was wondering why they did not render and got an answer from scai https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/60067/why-are-some-pedestrian-areas-not-rendering I'm attempting to fix the problems in the USA and guess I messed up a couple.

Thanks for your comment. I'll verify all the changes. This one was not by andygol but has the same problem and needs area=yes.

Hi andygol, I asked the question and got some interesting comments.
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/60067/why-are-some-pedestrian-areas-not-rendering
I'll be changing the MA ways to highway=pedestrian area=yes

No problem. I too appreciate it when people comment on my changesets. Thanks for all the work your doing. I encourage you to spend more time mapping in the Bedford/Burlington MA area. Alan

Hi, Looks like you were busy adding parking lot lanes near Crosby Drive in bedford. Many of them seem to be missing connectors between the ends of aisles. You might consider adding the tag service=parking_aisle to complement highway=service
Thanks for your work, the map is looking more complete

After highway=pedestrian and area=yes were changed to area:highway=pedestrian and area=yes they no longer render in OSM . I'm looking at the 50+ occurrences in Massachusetts? Do you know why?

Nice. I'll have to check it out.

These tags are artifacts of a long ago import. Many Massachusetts mappers, but not all, agree they should be deleted. I try to delete them from highway ways and nodes I edit. I'll consider deleting them from landuse or leisure ways as well. What we need is a mass removal. Thanks for the comment. Alan