I am going to deleted this feature as there is no physical evidence in any imagery> The tags do not make sense either.

Hi DominikFehervary

I don't understand why you have mapped this rectangle highway=river. way/1453542678#map=18/7.050723/9.476636 Highways are for roads, a river is a waterway. However, what is this rectangle representing with the name of fi? It's a ditch in a tidal river according to your tags. I see you have only made two edits, so I assume this was a mistaken test?

Adrian

Thank you Frans.

Hi Frans. I suspect I would have picked that up in my OSMI/OSMose QA checks. Did you make the change to unclassified? Are you advising that I should do so for this or just in future?

Hi WT Hundu. While mapping some waterways, I noticed very small residential areas in a larger residential area here way/1389490341/history#map=19/7.342733/9.705768 This is not usually correct.
Then I noticed that they appear to have the names of people living there. This does not follow the rules of OpenStreetMap, described here. osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information. The small residential area should probably be removed. However they could be replaced with individual rectangular or round buildings with building=yes, but no personal information. If you personally know they are houses, then use building=house. If you have any questions, just reply to this comment.
Regards,
Adrian

Hi jajanja3,
Great work mapping the drives and gardens around Istead Rise. The changeset description mentions houses. I wondered what you did? I thought I'd mapped them well.
Also, I think the footways along the roads should also be tagged footway=sidewalk, see osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way
Adrian